InfoWars' main YouTube channel is two strikes away from being banned...Hahahahahahaha

Frankfooter · Mar 8, 2018

Smallcock said:
What does "linked to" mean? Lol

Do you know the difference between conducting studies and mere citations of studies? The overwhelming majority of IQ research has nothing to do with your favourite guy, Ruston, nor the pioneer fund. Repeating a lie doesn't make it true. You're also old enough to know that being a bad guy doesn't mean the science you study, cite, or conduct is faulty. Plenty of bad people (i.e. What you call racists) have done amazing things in science and tech.

When you can cite dozens of studies showing data in the opposite direction let us know. For now, I'll stick with what science and the scientists have told us.

As in funded by.
You were challenged to provide scientists and studies previously and every single study or scientist you named was linked to Rushton and his Pioneer Fund.
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...ca-not-black&p=5969923&viewfull=1#post5969923

Read it and refresh your memory.
You may need a genetic test as well, as it appears your dick may not be the only small organ you own.
Perhaps there are some small headed people in your background.

(sarcastic response based on the tenets of Rushton's claims, for those curious)

Smallcock · Mar 8, 2018

Frankfooter said:
As in funded by.
You were challenged to provide scientists and studies previously and every single study or scientist you named was linked to Rushton and his Pioneer Fund.
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...ca-not-black&p=5969923&viewfull=1#post5969923

Read it and refresh your memory.
You may need a genetic test as well, as it appears your dick may not be the only small organ you own.
Perhaps there are some small headed people in your background.

(sarcastic response based on the tenets of Rushton's claims, for those curious)

You just provided a link to 52 scientists that agree with me, most of whom are not linked to PF. And the pioneer fund is... for funding research. You seem to dislike what they research but that's too bad for you, and good for science.

I remember many things from that thread including that the pioneer fund is a nazi organization (in your feeble mind) yet the scientists you link to it are Jewish lol. This is the confusion and conflation that happens when you rely on feelings over facts, and political correctness over truth.

It's ironic that you mention small organs. It was you who originally claimed there is no correlation between brain size and IQ. Lol

Be a good student like Oagre and stop embarrassing yourself further.

Frankfooter · Mar 8, 2018

Smallcock said:
You just provided a link to 52 scientists that agree with me, most of whom are not linked to PF. And the pioneer fund is... for funding research. You seem to dislike what they research but that's too bad for you, and good for science.

I remember many things from that thread including that the pioneer fund is a nazi organization (in your feeble mind) yet the scientists you link to it are Jewish lol. This is the confusion and conflation that happens when you rely on feelings over facts, and political correctness over truth.

It's ironic that you mention small organs. It was you who originally claimed there is no correlation between brain size and IQ. Lol

Be a good student like Oagre and stop embarrassing yourself further.

Read the post, every scientist investigated had links to your racist Pioneer Fund.
Showing that all your 'science' comes from Rushton and his funding.

By the way, its not 'ironic', its a total failure that you do not understand the term 'sarcastic' in relation to the comment about your small organs.

canada-man · Mar 8, 2018

Smallcock said:
What does "linked to" mean? Lol

Do you know the difference between conducting studies and mere citations of studies? The overwhelming majority of IQ research has nothing to do with your favourite guy, Ruston, nor the pioneer fund. Repeating a lie doesn't make it true. You're also old enough to know that being a bad guy doesn't mean the science you study, cite, or conduct is faulty. Plenty of bad people (i.e. What you call racists) have done amazing things in science and tech.

When you can cite dozens of studies showing data in the opposite direction let us know. For now, I'll stick with what science and the scientists have told us.

frankfooter only read from sources that agrees with him. he likes to boast about the value of a university education but lack critical thinking skills

Smallcock · Mar 8, 2018

Frankfooter said:
Read the post, every scientist investigated had links to your racist Pioneer Fund.
Showing that all your 'science' comes from Rushton and his funding.

By the way, its not 'ironic', its a total failure that you do not understand the term 'sarcastic' in relation to the comment about your small organs.

List for us every single study that Ruston has conducted on IQ. Let's see how many there are and how it measures up with your toothless propaganda.

mandrill · Mar 8, 2018

Smallcock said:
You just provided a link to 52 scientists that agree with me, most of whom are not linked to PF. And the pioneer fund is... for funding research. You seem to dislike what they research but that's too bad for you, and good for science.

I remember many things from that thread including that the pioneer fund is a nazi organization (in your feeble mind) yet the scientists you link to it are Jewish lol. This is the confusion and conflation that happens when you rely on feelings over facts, and political correctness over truth.

It's ironic that you mention small organs. It was you who originally claimed there is no correlation between brain size and IQ. Lol

Be a good student like Oagre and stop embarrassing yourself further.

If the scientists are getting funding from a Far Right racist organization, then they are expected to provide results that justify that racist organization's investment and confidence in the scientists selected. So all of those scientists are tainted goods and none of those studies is reputable.

Next you will be telling me that the Tobacco Industry's studies on cancer and smoking were all reliable and fair as well!

Frankfooter · Mar 8, 2018

Smallcock said:
List for us every single study that Ruston has conducted on IQ. Let's see how many there are and how it measures up with your toothless propaganda.

That's your job.

You made a claim about genetics and race and that there was science to support it.
Yet all the scientists you used to support your claim were linked or funded through the Pioneer Fund.

You tried and failed this argument previously.

Smallcock · Mar 8, 2018

oagre said:
If the scientists are getting funding from a Far Right racist organization, then they are expected to provide results that justify that racist organization's investment and confidence in the scientists selected. So all of those scientists are tainted goods and none of those studies is reputable.

Next you will be telling me that the Tobacco Industry's studies on cancer and smoking were all reliable and fair as well!

The handful of studies done by the "far right" (i.e. Non-mainstream) corroborate the hundreds of studies on IQ done over the past century. WTF are you on about?

Smallcock · Mar 8, 2018

Frankfooter said:
That's your job.

You made a claim about genetics and race and that there was science to support it.
Yet all the scientists you used to support your claim were linked or funded through the Pioneer Fund.

You tried and failed this argument previously.

There are so few it's not even worth looking. That's the point. The science relies on decades of work from scientists of all backgrounds and political,affiliations and institutions.

Frankfooter · Mar 8, 2018

Smallcock said:
There are so few it's not even worth looking. That's the point. The science relies on decades of work from scientists of all backgrounds and political,affiliations and institutions.

Good science does show multiple sources for research.

White supremacist justifications pretending to be science that you promote all appear to be linked to the Pioneer Fund and Rushton.

essguy_ · Mar 8, 2018

Smallcock - instead of spending time studying papers on the genetic differences of IQ - maybe you should look inward to try to understand why you see a baby boy dick when you look in the mirror. The same problem may be colouring your perception of a lot of things - including your interpretation of scientific research. Seriously - it's hard to take anybody seriously when they have such a messed up, short-eyed view of their own junk.

Smallcock · Mar 8, 2018

We know that intelligence is partly related to genes. There is no disputing this: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-intelligence-hereditary/

Your claim is that we cannot extend this to average differences measured between groups in differently geographic regions. The differences have been repeatedly measured and the observed for a century.

You're being ridiculous..

Smallcock · Mar 8, 2018

essguy_ said:
Smallcock - instead of spending time studying papers on the genetic differences of IQ - maybe you should look inward to try to understand why you see a baby boy dick when you look in the mirror. The same problem may be colouring your perception of a lot of things - including your interpretation of scientific research. Seriously - it's hard to take anybody seriously when they have such a messed up, short-eyed view of their own junk.

This is an unrelated issue that I'm being treated for.

Smallcock · Mar 11, 2018

Great interview with Richard Haier about the history of IQ, studies, cultural bias, education, (and when studying intelligence/IQ went from being of great interest in scientific research to a radioactive endeavor in the late 1960s).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQI6nGak8sU

Frankfooter · Jul 20, 2019

essguy_ said:
Smallcock - instead of spending time studying papers on the genetic differences of IQ - maybe you should look inward to try to understand why you see a baby boy dick when you look in the mirror. The same problem may be colouring your perception of a lot of things - including your interpretation of scientific research. Seriously - it's hard to take anybody seriously when they have such a messed up, short-eyed view of their own junk.

The Rushton r-K theory of race probably gives smallcock his only satisfaction for being smallcock. Rushton incorrectly theorized that there were two breeding strategies, have lots of kids and hope they survive or just one or two and give them all your attention to make sure they survive. The Rushton theory claimed that big dicks and small heads/brain size went together and was characteristic of Africans while tiny dicks and big brains were characteristic of Asian populations and Europeans were 'just right'. Stupid and incorrect theory, disproved repeatedly now. But likely for smallcock it lets him think his tiny dick comes with a big brain and the ability to understand Rushton much better than us.

Smallcock · Jul 20, 2019

FF, what is your obsession with Rushton? He's a non-entity in intelligence research. Get up to speed, it's not the 1980s anymore.

Search

InfoWars' main YouTube channel is two strikes away from being banned...Hahahahahahaha

Frankfooter

dangling member

Smallcock

Active member

Frankfooter

dangling member

canada-man

Well-known member

Smallcock

Active member

mandrill

Well-known member

Frankfooter

dangling member

Smallcock

Active member

Smallcock

Active member

Frankfooter

dangling member

essguy_

Active member

Smallcock

Active member

Smallcock

Active member

Smallcock

Active member

Frankfooter

dangling member

Smallcock

Active member