You just finished saying that there was an actual deputy on site that was mandated to protect the school, yet didn't do his job.No, that's a practical solution. There's no way that, in the foreseeable future, there will be any meaningful action on firearm possession in the United States. There are only two choices: actively protect schools or wish for a Democratic Congress and a Democratic President to, some day, change the make up of the Supreme Court to facilitate the opposite treatment of the 2nd Amendment.
Now you are saying that more armed people on site will actually fix things?
So now we will have more people who are inadequately trained, more guns, more crossfire, more dead innocent kids. Brilliant.