Toronto Escorts

Man jailed over attempt to import child sex doll

Freedom1970

Banned
Jan 4, 2011
307
0
16
Scary times we live in with such over reaching authoritarianism. I remember reading the article. This doll was NOT advertise as a child. Due to it's small stature & facial features L.E. decided it was child like. Furthermore there was no established laws about such dolls in place.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
Scary times we live in with such over reaching authoritarianism. I remember reading the article. This doll was NOT advertise as a child. Due to it's small stature & facial features L.E. decided it was child like. Furthermore there was no established laws about such dolls in place.
Look at it. It's a facsimile of a child. Anyone can see that.

It's enabling child abuse. By thinking it's ok to create and normalize it via proxy.

It's a suck fuck who ordered this. And no different then child porn.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
18,068
12,504
113
Look at it. It's a facsimile of a child. Anyone can see that.

It's enabling child abuse. By thinking it's ok to create and normalize it via proxy.

It's a suck fuck who ordered this. And no different then child porn.
As sick as it may sound would you not rather have him release his urges on a doll as opposed to a real child?

What will the charge be, harming a plastic object?
 
Nov 2, 2017
59
8
8
If people are attracted to kids isnt this...exactly what we want them to be doing? It literally harms no kids, this seems pretty ideal.

I also fail to see how its "no different than child porn" considering there is no kids involved in this at all. Child porn isnt illegal because "its fucked up that people like it"...if that was true all kinds of porn would be illegal. Child porn is illegal because children are harmed. Which they clearly are not in this scenario. Fucked up.
 

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
10,873
2,142
113
As sick as it may sound would you not rather have him release his urges on a doll as opposed to a real child?

What will the charge be, harming a plastic object?
I agree with you. I would be concerned if he was a grade school teacher.
 

anon1

Well-known member
Aug 19, 2001
10,314
2,135
113
Tranquility Base, La Luna
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/maidstone/news/grandfather-ordered-lifelike-child-sex-doll-160380/

Brian Leach claimed he only ordered the £500 doll from a company in China as a companion and did not intend to have sex with it.The 62-year-old NHS worker was also found to have 278 child sex abuse images on his computer, 29 of which were in the most serious category.

 

Ffm_BV

Member
Dec 9, 2017
40
0
6
Read an article a while back where psychologists who treat pedophiles and sex offenders talked about this subject. Apparently, giving them child like dolls is a problem. Common sense would tell us it’s a harmless way for them to handle their urges but the reality is that it seems to desensitize them to the idea of molesting children.

If you ask me, chemical castration is the way to go.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,310
1,665
113
Ghawar
A guy who fondles a child mannequin in a dress store
could be charged for child abuse.
 

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
If people are attracted to kids isnt this...exactly what we want them to be doing? It literally harms no kids, this seems pretty ideal.

I also fail to see how its "no different than child porn" considering there is no kids involved in this at all. Child porn isnt illegal because "its fucked up that people like it"...if that was true all kinds of porn would be illegal. Child porn is illegal because children are harmed. Which they clearly are not in this scenario. Fucked up.
Software can be used to make child porn that does not harm any children in it's creation. Still a bad idea.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,154
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/maidstone/news/grandfather-ordered-lifelike-child-sex-doll-160380/

Brian Leach claimed he only ordered the £500 doll from a company in China as a companion and did not intend to have sex with it.The 62-year-old NHS worker was also found to have 278 child sex abuse images on his computer, 29 of which were in the most serious category.


vice media claims pedos like him are "harmless"
 

wilbur

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
2,079
0
36
No child is being harmed. He was convicted because of what was in his mind.

Welcome to the thought police.
 

eternalbachelor

New member
Jan 17, 2017
426
1
0
are you fucking kidding me? Canada today will put you in jail for anime cartoons depicting child porn for 6 months minimum.

Mr. Mahannah was a resident of California. He travelled to Ottawa in connection with his employment. In the airport, he was detained after a search of his computer revealed the presence of child pornography. An analysis revealed pictures of cartoon and anime child pornography – not one picture of a real child. Although these pictures were illegal in Canada, they were not illegal in California, and he purchased them legally from a Japanese branch of Amazon.com. The defendant was not a pedophile, he had family support, he was at the lowest possible risk to reoffend. He had no knowledge the pictures were illegal in Canada. As a result of the charges he lost his job. The images were explicit and there were 50,000 of them. He was sentenced to 45 days in prison.
http://canlii.ca/t/h5jv2 in para 80.

Since then Harper brought the minimum up to 6 months
 

wilbur

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
2,079
0
36
They went after a pedophile a few years ago, who was caught drawing his own paedophilia pictures out of his own imagination. They were never distributed. So he was charged with possession of child pornography. I believe that the Supreme Court acquitted him, because his drawings were an image of what what is his mind, you can't erase what's in someone's mind. The State cannot punish you for what you think.

As for the doll itself, it was seized because you could construe that it's pronographic. But I think that's as far as it should have gone. In fact, unless he admitted to it, did he really know in advance what it was going to look like? What if the doll was a reprentation of a midget? The guy may have had a fetish of midgets?
 

Bobzilla

Buy-sexual
Oct 26, 2002
1,958
174
63
59
Read an article a while back where psychologists who treat pedophiles and sex offenders talked about this subject. Apparently, giving them child like dolls is a problem. Common sense would tell us it’s a harmless way for them to handle their urges but the reality is that it seems to desensitize them to the idea of molesting children.

If you ask me, chemical castration is the way to go.
Agreed. It's only a matter of time before the doll stops satisfying them & they turn to real children.
 

Freedom1970

Banned
Jan 4, 2011
307
0
16
No child is being harmed. He was convicted because of what was in his mind.

Welcome to the thought police.
Yup ... a dangerous direction governments are going in & we must stop them!! Democrats & the fake news Liberal media machine are out of control in the U.S.A.
 

Freedom1970

Banned
Jan 4, 2011
307
0
16
Customs. It would be labeled as to what content. I gather the short stature would have got them curious to open & look at. Clearly x-ray would show no drugs smuggled so that would not have caused reason to actually open .... and thus see the face & draw their conclusion. More than ridiculous it is absolutely scary ....
 
Toronto Escorts