You sure lie a lot.And Hamas has been clear that they will take a Two state peace only as a temporary step to their goal of removing Jews from the region.
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...ael-deserves-its-international-pariah-status/Palestinians are facing genocide; Israel deserves its international pariah status
In your world quoting Hamas' explicit statements is lying.You sure lie a lot....
You haven't quoted anyone, this is just you.In your world quoting Hamas' explicit statements is lying.
And your op/ed publisher is full of shit. The only thing close to genocide is what your Hamas heroes would do if they could.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018...ation-state-bill-reading-180315192911365.htmlIsraeli parliament endorses 'nation-state bill' for first reading
Key Knesset committee approves final draft of 'Zionism's flagship bill' defining Israel exclusively as nation for Jews.
You haven't quoted anyone, this is just you...
No surprise that Al Jazeera's reporting on Israel is majorly skewed as the law explicitly protects rights of all religions and at this point is a draft bill, not a law. Their are things I don't like about it but it is not what al Jazeera and their pet anti-Israel activist claim....
The 'Nation-state bill' looks like it will go through soon.
That would make Israel officially apartheid....
Hard to say how reliable that report is, as its not an official statement but second hand claims of something said during a meeting.It's sad that you intentionally ignore Hamas' terrorism, rejection of peace, religious totalitarianism, and corruption just because you agree with that Israel should be destroyed.
Oct 2017.
“Over is the time Hamas spent discussing recognizing Israel. Now Hamas will discuss when we will wipe out Israel,” Sinwar said, according to the Hamas-linked news agency Shehab.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-chief-we-wont-discuss-recognizing-israel-only-wiping-it-out/
Pretty much exposes your bullshit for what it is.
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-gaza-s-sinwar-is-the-hamas-approach-to-back-1.5820866The first is the conciliatory approach of the Hamas leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, who has been looking inward at Palestinian society and views the alliance with Egypt and national unity as the key to freeing Palestinian society from its economic, social, political and national ills. He has called on all segments of society to save the reconciliation effort, and has expressed a willingness to put Hamas’ weapons of resistance under the authority of the Palestine Liberation Organization.
He has repeatedly said Hamas does not want a war with Israel. His actions have reflected a genuine effort to douse Hamas’ destructive reputation and restore its image as a national movement working for the economic, social and political benefit of the Palestinian people.
https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east...a-really-said-about-war-with-israel-1.5451136If Israel does something stupid well crush it, If Israel starts a war well crush it — these were the top headlines in most Israeli newspapers and news sites, quoting the Hamas leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, at a media briefing a month ago. Why did Israeli editors choose these headlines, noting only in the subhead or body of the item that Sinwar also said Hamas doesnt want a confrontation with Israel?
The answer is clear. The headlines matched the populist theres no partner for peace attitude, that reassures the Israelis and obviates the need for them to think. Did any journalist mention that Israel has made the same warning — attrition will be met with a pounding (as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in 2014)?
For Israel, such belligerence is part of the heroic talk that makes us stand tall, puff out our chests and remind everyone in the regional neighborhood of our power. But when the Palestinians take the same tack, its a threat that reminds us once again of the nature of our adversary, and that theres no possibility of change.
And so, instead of settling for the interpretations in the Hebrew media, I offer an annotated summary of Sinwars remarks in Arabic.
1. Hamas is not at all interested in war with Israel. The longer the war is postponed, by an hour, a year or years, it serves the Palestinian interest, and its better to put it off as long as possible. If the occupation government dares to attack militarily, the resistance forces will regain what they lost in the last war, and theyre willing to conduct the next confrontation over a long period and even to crush the Israelis. Hamas has weapons of deterrence that make Israel think 1,000 times before attacking Gaza, and if it behaves foolishly, it is liable to regret it.
2. Hamas coordinates closely with the Jerusalem Brigades, the military wing of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and is ready to cooperate with all factions of the armed resistance. Sinwar needs his political rivals in Fatah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine to prevent the erosion of his political legitimacy and his patriotic image in light of the security coordination with Egypt, but also to warn the Hamas leadership on the West Bank and abroad against getting close to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas behind his back.
There is no Palestine or Palestinian law, so I have no idea what you are talking about.No surprise that Al Jazeera's reporting on Israel is majorly skewed as the law explicitly protects rights of all religions and at this point is a draft bill, not a law. Their are things I don't like about it but it is not what al Jazeera and their pet anti-Israel activist claim.
Of course Palestinian law defines Palestine as an Islamic state based on Islamic law but you don't have a problem with that.
I find it so surprising that you choose to ignore Hamas once again. It's a Hamas news site and you still deny what was said.Hard to say how reliable that report is, as its not an official statement but second hand claims of something said during a meeting.....
Another invention from you. I have quoted the Palestinian constitution to you several times.There is no Palestine or Palestinian law, so I have no idea what you are talking about.....
You quoted the Times of Israel.I find it so surprising that you choose to ignore Hamas once again. It's a Hamas news site and you still deny what was said.
https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/breaking-gaza-declares-state-emergency/BREAKING: Gaza declares state of emergency
Great, and how is that relevant?Another invention from you. I have quoted the Palestinian constitution to you several times.
Your glorification of Hamas is what's sad.You quoted the Times of Israel.
Your fascination with Hamas is a little sad....
Another cop-out from you that outright exposes your hypocrisy. Why is it you are adamantly opposed to Israel having Judaism as a state religion but you are perfectly okay with Palestine (and many Arab states) having Islam as their official religion?Great, and how is that relevant?...
Israel is apartheid and its not Hamas' fault, no matter what you argue.Your glorification of Hamas is what's sad.
But sure, keep on pretending Hamas isn't a ....
Setting an official religion is fine, institutionalizing lesser human rights for those of other religions is not.Another cop-out from you that outright exposes your hypocrisy. Why is it you are adamantly opposed to Israel having Judaism as a state religion but you are perfectly okay with Palestine (and many Arab states) having Islam as their official religion?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018...ation-state-bill-reading-180315192911365.htmlIn the words of one of the handful of Palestinian members of the Israeli parliament, Aida Touma-Suleiman, the bill "institutionalises an apartheid regime in the most blatant way".
But equally significantly, and largely unnoticed, the Basic Law paves the way for Israel's right-wing government to consolidate and expand the annexation of Palestinian lands under occupation in East Jerusalem and the West Bank - and stymie any legal moves intended to prevent such efforts.
So why do the Palestinians do it?Setting an official religion is fine, institutionalizing lesser human rights for those of other religions is not.....
They don't.So why do the Palestinians do it?
More of your denials. The PA has actual laws denying rights to Jews, not the made up accusations you have. Their leaders, especially in Hamas routinely make racist comments about Jews.They don't. ...
Would you like to compare to see which side has the most racist laws?More of your denials. The PA has actual laws denying rights to Jews, not the made up accusations you have.
https://www.adalah.org/en/law/view/598"Anti-Terror" (Counter-Terrorism) Law
Theme:Criminal Law and ProceduresCivil and Political RightsFreedom of Association
Status:Active
Year:2016
Description:
The “Counter-Terrorism” bill sprawls over 104 pages. It contains broad and vague definitions of terrorism and terrorist organizations, which may be exploited by the law enforcement authorities to criminalize legitimate political action by Palestinian citizens of Israel and Palestinian residents of the OPT. The law entrenches many emergency regulations, which are currently in effect, and which date back to the British Mandatory period. The government has recently used the emergency regulations to arbitrarily outlaw the Islamic Movement in Israel.
The law includes draconian measures for investigating detainees accused of security offenses; provides for the extensive use of secret evidence in court; limits detainees’ access to judicial review; lowers the evidentiary requirements of the state in such cases; creates new criminal offenses, including for any public expression of support for or sympathy with a terrorist group; and sharply increases the maximum sentences for people convicted of security offenses. It is liable to result in serious human rights violations and to further undermine democratic principles in Israel.
The law substantially strengthens and expands the powers of the police and the General Security Services (GSS, or Shabak/Shin Bet) to suppress legitimate protest activities by Palestinian citizens of Israel and Palestinian residents of the OPT. It adds to a pre-existing system that provides fertile ground for the security agencies to employ illegal methods in the interrogation room, which includes a “temporary order” that exempts the security agencies from producing audio or visual documentation of interrogations of security detainees. The Knesset extended this order, which creates conditions that may facilitate the torture of security suspects during interrogation, in July 2015, for the third time.
You'll ignore the results as usual so what's the point?Would you like to compare to see which side has the most racist laws?....
