Royal Spa
Toronto Escorts

Trump Scores 30/30 on Montreal Cognitive Test

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
http://washingtonpress.com/wp-content/uploads/MoCAScreenshot-1-794x1024.jpg

This is the test that the president scored "perfect" on. It's pretty clear that the test is designed for people with advanced alzheimer's who have difficulty making it through the day without assistance.

A spoiled man-child narcissist on the other hand would do perfectly well on the test.
20% of the score (6 points out of 30) were awarded because he could correctly state the date and what city he is in.
But a perfect score proves beyond a doubt that he is a stable genius.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
9,821
1,603
113
Except the doctors(12) who are involved in the examination are all independent. They are not hired by Trump.

Sorry but you are going to have to accept this as legit.

Or don't. But it ends the narrative.
We know from pictures that his height and weight was faked. We also know from watching him spew his fragmented thoughts for the last year on camera and on Twitter, that he is mentally fried. But yea, a 6 year old could pass that test ( but I bet Trump had to cheat). He says he was a brilliant student too, but his professor begs to differ. But by all means, keep telling yourself the narrative has ended...LOL
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
9,821
1,603
113
In politics, you don't have to be smarter than everyone, just smarter than your opponents. Fortunately for Trump last election, all that opposition consisted of was Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party, almost the entire mainstream media, numerous SJW groups, and all of Hollywood. Maybe he won't be so lucky next time.
yea....maybe Putin won't be pulling the strings this time
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
20% of the score (6 points out of 30) were awarded because he could correctly state the date and what city he is in.
But a perfect score proves beyond a doubt that he is a stable genius.
Or perhaps that his coach is?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
I suspect you don't really need this clarification, but category b) voters might well have qualitatively "disapproved" of both Trump and Clinton, but disapproved of Clinton relatively more, and therefore cast their vote for Trump hoping for the lesser of evils.

It certainly did take errors on the part of Clinton, her party, the media, Hollywood, as well as other Clinton supporters for her to lose, but it always does in every election. The question is whether anyone in the Democratic party or among its allies are prepared to admit their errors. Not so far. The media is continuing the same tact that ultimately worked in Trump's favour. Further, it certainly was a critical error if the Clinton campaign didn't really understand that the election would not be decided on the basis of the national popular vote, since there are no other kinds of wins in US presidential elections apart from Electoral College wins.

p.s. I can actually agree that it's sad that no one better than Trump was standing for election as President. However, I think it would have been even sadder if Clinton had won.
Although I think the overall 'calculus of unattractiveness' that you laid out was quite accurate, it's clear from the voting result that you and your fellows were solidly in the minority. And still are by current polling of his approval. Without a competing candidate matching disapproval is clearly impossible.

Being decidedly the lesser evil in the thinking of most Americans wasn't enough for Clinton to overcome a rigged system which counted one vote for Trump in the Boise equal to five votes for her in Buffalo. Only if Trump converts his total to a true majority, or if the Democrats repeat their ineffective campaign, can anyone compellingly assert the supposed virtue of discarding the free choice of the many millions of voters in favour of the compelled votes of a few hundred loyalists handpicked by and from party elites. We'll both have to wait for that to play out; neither Party's advertising its strategy for 2020.

What the many-voiced media is doing — fake, mainstream, lefty or righty — is entirely business as usual: telling stories to attract consumers they can sell on to advertisers. Some supported Trump, some reviled him, and in the middle, most just reported whatever they found that was juiciest as best they could discover and defend it. So far, very little of the 'bad' has been disproven and none of the 'good' juice did him enough credit to build his support into a majority then or since. Why would any of them change?

Voters however may change. So far, there's little sign Trump is persuading many to improve their opinions of him.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
38,095
6,428
113
Us mere mortals cannot comprehend the scope of Trump's awesomeness, he is a human Higgs boson. It would take a collider the size of the Solar System to figure out how the Higgs boson interacts with sub atomic particles, likewise in understanding Trump's mind. This is the anniversary of his inauguration, 100 million people showed up for that event. He should be made President for life, his inflatable Putin would be so proud.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,732
6,289
113
I think it is stupid to gloat about Trump's sanity. If he's not losing it then it means he's one fucked up egotist.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts