PLXTO
Toronto Escorts

The FCC Will Vote to Repeal Net Neutrality on Thursday

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will vote to repeal the agency’s net neutrality rule on Thursday, much to the dismay of Silicon Valley and Democrats and to the cheer of conservatives.
The FCC will vote on Chairman Ajit Pai’s “Restoring Internet Freedom Order” on Thursday, which would repeal the FCC’s 2015 net neutrality rule, which regulated the internet as a public monopoly.

Chairman Pai told Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Monday, “I think what net neutrality repealed would actually mean is we once again have a free and open internet. The government would not be regulating how anyone in the internet service providers, how anyone else in the internet economy manages their networks.”

Net neutrality proponents argued that the FCC needs net neutrality to prevent ISPs from unfairly blocking, throttling, or preferring some content, while conservatives argued that net neutrality would diminish the freedom of the internet. The FCC and Breitbart News’s Allum Bokhari explained that under net neutrality, content providers such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter serve as a greater threat to internet censorship compared to ISPs.

Democrats and Silicon Valley companies argued that content providers cannot compete on an even playing field without net neutrality.

Congressman Mike Doyle (D-PA) said on Tuesday, “All you have to do is look at what went on over the last 10 or 15 years to see how the [internet service providers] repeatedly sought to crush potential competitors and challenged the FCC’s previous net neutrality rules in court to understand why the Open Internet Order was needed — and to see what will happen if the Open Internet Order is repealed.”

On Monday Pai and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) agreed to share the responsibility to police unfair ISP practices regarding unfair or deceptive practices to block, throttle, or promote web content.

FCC Chairman Pai said in a recent speech that repealing net neutrality would restore the internet as a free and open platform.

“So when you get past the wild accusations, fearmongering, and hysteria, here’s the boring bottom line: the plan to restore Internet freedom would return us to the light touch, market-based approach under which the Internet thrived. And that’s why I am asking my colleagues to vote for it on December 14,” Pai concluded.


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ll-vote-to-repeal-net-neutrality-on-thursday/
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
This is actually terrifying.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
Once again Trump shows he is a friend to the middle class. NOT. Again he shows that he will throw the middle class under the bus to benefit large corporations and donors. SAD
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,773
3
0
The first of what will probably be several lawsuits all asking for injunctions will likely be filed within an hour of the vote.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Sad that the OP, who relies primarily on random internet videos, is celebrating Trump's government rejecting the idea of an independent internet.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Sad that the OP, who relies primarily on random internet videos, is celebrating Trump's government rejecting the idea of an independent internet.
the internet was free and open before Obama imposed net neutrality. and it will be free and open with and without net neutrality.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
My favorite reasons for opposing the move: BLM will no longer have a voice, women will not be able to find abortion clinics and something to do with the global warming. LOL! Really tells me everything about the subject, doesn't it?
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
the internet was free and open before Obama imposed net neutrality. and it will be free and open with and without net neutrality.
You obviously have no idea what net neutrality is but you seem to be adept a repeating GOP talking points.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
You obviously have no idea what net neutrality is but you seem to be adept a repeating GOP talking points.
under net neutrality rules frm 2015-2015 twitter, facebook and google admitting to censoring right wing view points, manipulating search results, banning members, etc

Google Preaches 'Net Neutrality,' Then Censors Conservative Videos?

https://www.investors.com/politics/...-practice-what-it-preaches-on-net-neutrality/


The latest evidence of this comes from Dennis Prager, a conservative talk-show host whose syndicated column appears regularly in IBD and who also runs Prager University. PragerU produces hundreds of educational videos from academics and other experts on various topics, ranging from the history of the Korean War to Israel's founding. There's no profanity, no nudity, no calls to violence. But the videos do give conservatives a voice.

On Monday, PragerU filed suit against Google (GOOGL) for singling out dozens of PragerU videos for censorship only because they are conservative. YouTube did this, the suit claims, by labeling the videos as "inappropriate" for younger or sensitive viewers — making them unavailable to anyone in a "restricted" viewing setting — or by "demonetizing" them, which means PragerU doesn't get ad revenue, even if the videos are widely viewed.

PragerU says it tried to work with YouTube for a year to get its videos off the site's "restricted" list, and ended up receiving conflicting, vague and unhelpful answers from the company.






How Facbook and Twitter censor conservative voices

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...ter-are-systematically-silencing-conservative


also Twitter regularly suspend twitter accounts of many porn stars that didn't break thier rules
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
more net neutrality hypocrisy


https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/net-neutrality-hypocrisy-runs-amok/


Advocates of net neutrality insist that it's all about protecting a free and open internet from greedy ISPs. So why are these same advocates silent when giant internet companies try to censor the web?

When Ajit Pai, the new head of the Federal Communications Commission, announced plans to roll back the Obama administration's aggressive regulation of internet service providers on net neutrality grounds, tens of thousands of internet companies and a multitude of celebrities joined a big online "Day of Action" in July to protest the move, and flooded the FCC with more than 1 million comments urging them to keep the rules in place. Industry giants including Google (GOOGL)and Facebook (FB) back the effort.

Advocates say that the net neutrality rules are necessary to keep the web free from censorship, throttling, and extra fees.

So what explains the nonreaction among these groups when it's giant companies like Google, Apple or Facebook that are doing the censoring?

Such incidents of censorship are starting to pile up.

In July, Google announced an update to its search algorithm that it said would help screen out what Google has determined is "blatantly misleading, low quality, offensive or downright false information." The World Socialist website says its traffic from Google dropped 70% after the change.

In early August, YouTube announced that it would quarantine videos that it decided contained "controversial religious or supremacist content," even though the videos didn't violate YouTube's terms of service. The videos would remain on the site, the company said, but "won't be recommended, won't be monetized, and won't have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes."

Shortly after, several conservatives complained that their videos had been "demonetized" by YouTube.

Around the same time, Wired ran an article complaining that "LGBTQ people's posts have been blocked (by Facebook) recently for using words like 'dyke,' 'fag,' or 'tranny' to describe ourselves and our communities." The authors said it amounted to "a form of censorship."

Apple Pay pulled support from websites that sell white supremacist merchandise. PayPal and crowdfunding sites did likewise.

While censoring white supremacists might seem like a reasonable decision for an internet company, there's a very slippery slope here.

As the Electronic Frontier Foundation put it, "any tactic used now to silence neo-Nazis will soon be used against others, including people whose opinions we agree with."

Our view is that the competitive market should sort this all out. If Google wants to skew its search results, consumers might decide to use Bing instead. But the increasing consolidation of the internet does raise a legitimate concern about these companies' power and ability to silence voices they don't like by labeling them fake news or hate speech.

If Comcast or AT&T were doing such things, you can be sure there'd be hell to pay.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
so tech giants who support "net neutrality" are the same ones that censor everything they don't like


https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/07/you...call-out-google-net-neutrality-hypocrisy.html

https://www.fastcompany.com/4050458...alley-a-bunch-of-hypocrites-on-net-neutrality

Amid growing outrage over his plan to dismantle network neutrality rules, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai went into full attack mode against Apple, Twitter, and YouTube in a new op-ed in the Washington Times today.

The thrust of the op-ed is that big internet companies are hypocrites because they want regulations that demand big ISPs treat all content equally—even though they don’t practice what they preach on their own websites.

“If these companies are truly committed to an open internet where Americans can freely access the content of their choice, like I am, it’s curious that they focus on unnecessary and harmful regulation of other parts of the internet ecosystem with little history of engaging in this kind of behavior,” Pai writes.

He calls out Twitter for disallowing pro-life messages on GOP Representative Marsh Blackburn’s campaign video. In the ad, Blackburn states, “I fought Planned Parenthood and we stopped the sale of baby body parts,” which Twitter immediately flagged as “inflammatory.” Twitter eventually relented and ran the ad.

https://www.fastcompany.com/4050458...alley-a-bunch-of-hypocrites-on-net-neutrality
 
Toronto Escorts