Harvey Weinstein the serial sexual harasser.

Harvey Sweinstein and Hollywood's Hos

I’d like to better understand the conservative media’s orgy over Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced and disgraceful Hollywood film producer and studio executive who used his power over decades to have his way with starlets.

To listen to conservative talkers, the women affronted or assaulted by Weinstein were all Shakespearean talent in the making—female clones of Richard Burton (he had no match among women)—who made the pilgrimage to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Hollywood Hills, for the purpose of realizing their talent, never knowing it was a meat market. Watching the women who make up the dual-perspective panels “discussing” the Weinstein saga, it’s hard to tell conservative from liberal.

“Conservative” women now complain as bitterly as their liberal counterparts about “objectification.”

However, the female form has always been revered; been the object of sexual longing, clothed and nude. The reason the female figure is so crudely objectified nowadays has a great deal to do with … women themselves. By virtue of their conduct, women no longer inspire reverence as the fairer sex, and as epitomes of loveliness. For they are crasser, vainer, more eager to expose all voluntarily than any male. Except for Anthony Weiner, the name of an engorged organism indigenous to D.C., who was is in the habit of exposing himself as often as the Kardashians do.

The latter clan is a bevy of catty exhibitionists, controlled by a mercenary, ball-busting matriarch called Kris Kardashian. Kris is madam to America’s First Family of Celebrity Pornographers. (To launch a career with a highly stylized, self-directed sex tape is no longer even condemned.) Lots of little girls, with parental approval, look up to the Kardashians.

From Kim, distaff America learns to couch a preoccupation with pornographic selfies in the therapeutic idiom. Kardashian flaunts her ass elephantiasis with pure self-love. Yet millions of her admirers depict her obscene posturing online as an attempt to come to terms with her body. “Be a little easier on myself,” counsels Kim as she directs her camera to the nether reaches of her carefully posed, deformed derriere. While acting dirty and self-adoring, Kardashian delivers as close to a social jeremiad on self-esteem as her kind can muster. Genius!

Liberalism and libertinism are intertwined. The more liberal a woman, the more libertine she’ll be—and the more she’ll liberate herself to be coarse, immodest, vulgar and plain repulsive. Think of the menopausal Ashley Judd rapping lewdly about her (alleged) menstrual fluids at an anti-Trump rally. Think of all those liberal, liberated grannies adorning pussy dunce-caps on the same occasion.

By nature, the human woman is a peacock. We like to be noticed. The conservative among us prefer the allure of modesty. The sluts among us don’t. On social media, women outstrip men in the narcissistic and exhibitionist departments. In TV ads, American women, fat, thin, young and old, are grinding their bottoms, spreading their legs, showing the contours of their crotches, and dancing as though possessed (or like primates on heat), abandoning any semblance of femininity and gentility, all the while laughing like hyenas and hollering hokum like, “I Own It.”

The phrase a “bum’s rush” means “throw the bum out!” When it comes to Allison Williams, daughter of NBC icon Brian Williams, a bum’s rush takes on new meaning. Thanks in no small measure to her famous father, the young woman has become a sitcom star. And Ms. Williams has worked extra-hard to hone all aspects of an actress’s instrument (the body). Alison has carried forth enthusiastically about a groundbreaking scene dedicated to exploring “ass motorboating” or “booty-eating,” on HBO’s “Girls.”

The lewder, more pornographic, and less talented at their craft popular icons become—the louder the Left lauds their artistically dodgy output. (The “Right” just keeps moving Left.) “Singer” Miley Cyrus was mocked before she began twerking tush, thrusting pelvis and twirling tongue. Only then had she arrived as an artist, in the eyes of “critics” on the Left. The power of the average pop artist and her products, Miley’s included, lies in the pornography that is her “art,” in her hackneyed political posturing, and in the fantastic technology that is Auto-Tune (without which all the sound you’d hear these “singers” emit would be a bedroom whisper).

Liberal women, the majority, go about seriously and studiously cultivating their degeneracy. If “Raising Skirts to Celebrate the Diversity of Vaginas” sounds foul, wait for the accompanying images. These show feral creatures (women, presumably), skirts hoisted, gobs agape, some squatting like farmhands in an outhouse, all yelling about their orifices.

Do you know of a comparable man’s movement? If anything, men are punished when they react normally to women behaving badly.

Female soldiers got naked and uploaded explicit images of themselves to an online portal. The normals —male soldiers —shared the images and were promptly punished for so doing. And the conservative side of that ubiquitous, dueling-perspectives political panel approved of the punishment meted to the men.

So endemic is distaff degeneracy these days that “protesters” routinely disrobe or perform lewd acts with objects in public. Vladimir Putin is a great man if only for arresting a demented band of performance artists, Pussy Riot, for desecrating a Russian church.

If men flashed for freedom; they’d be arrested, jailed and placed on the National Sex Offender Registry.

Talk about the empress being in the buff, I almost forgot to attach an image of this celebrity, bare-bottomed on the red-carpet. Rose McGowan is hardly unique. Many a star will arrive at these events barely clothed. (Here are 38 more near-naked Red-Carpet appearances.)

Expect a feminist lecture about a woman’s right to pretend her bare bottom is haute couture, rather than ho couture, and expecting the Harveys of the world to behave like choir boys around her. Fine.


Being British, BBC News anchors are not nearly as dour about the Harvey hysteria as the American anchors. A female presenter began a Sweinstein segment by saying men claim the coverage of the scandal is excessive; women say the opposite. “That’s why we’re covering it,” quipped her witty male sidekick. She roared with laughter. That’s my girl!

Look, Harvey is a lowlife. But Hollywood hos are not as the sanctimonious Sean Hannity portrays them: “naive, innocent young things,” dreams shattered.

Click to expand...

canada-man said:

How is it that the very same Hollywood that is, by admission, overflowing with sexual predators has just launched yet another gun control campaign meant to make it more difficult for Americans, most especially women, to obtain the most effective weapon at stopping a sexual assault — a concealed firearm.
As my colleague Ken Klukowski so elegantly put it, “Guns are the ‘great equalizer’ because they neutralize any advantage the attacker has in size, strength, or speed. The sort of person who needs a gun the least is a full-sized, able-bodied adult male. Those who benefit most from the right to carry are the elderly, the physically challenged, and women.”

Even before this sexual assault dam burst wide open through Harvey Weinstein, Hollywood’s hypocrisy on the gun control issue was bad enough. But now that we know that countless sexual predators not only roam free in Hollywood, but that the Tinseltown elite will never create a climate that allows for these monsters to be identified and brought to justice, they still think they have the moral authority to tell women to give up their guns.

Here is a detailed list, from the victims themselves, of the endless number of predators who, we must assume, are still running around free. And that is just in Hollywood, and that list is, undoubtedly, far from complete.

Overall, when it comes to gun-grabbing, there is an emerging pattern we see from the left and their enablers in the national media.

The same university culture that tells us “1 in 5 or more women are sexually assaulted while in college” also opposes gun ownership.

The same media that lie to us about law enforcement being a culture filled with racists hunting down young black men, also tell us that only law enforcement should own guns.

The same Democrats who trash police officers as racist murders also tell us that only those police officers should own guns.

And now, we have Hollywood, an industry with a horrific rape culture, unlike anything we have seen before, wanting us to give up our guns.

In the face of all this sexual assault, of all these so-called murdering racists, why do Hollywood, Democrats, and the media want us defenseless, unarmed, and at the mercy of predators?

Gee, you almost get the feeling that the left would like to see all of us become helpless victims who are incapable of taking care of ourselves and, therefore, completely dependent on the government…

Ohhhh, now I get it.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...exual-predators-still-wants-take-womens-guns/

Click to expand...

dawnlee said:

it's a shame how sexual assault is so politicized by various factions to achieve some larger agenda that has little actual concern for real victims of sexual assault, whether it's radical feminists trying to prove something about "all men", or liberals trying to grab footing over conservatives, or even conservatives now trying to use harvey weinstein to get to hillary clinton. it was cool at first when people were starting to treat it seriously and all, but it's gotten way out of hand to the point now that the cultural narrative these feminist advocates are trying to push is that sexual assault is basically worse than murder.

but come on. yeah, the guys who do it are lowlife creeps who have zero game and are basically women repellers, and the only way they can get a girl to touch them is to force himself onto her, or dangle her career over her head... but the narrative now that like, the absolute worse thing that could ever happen to a young woman is if a drunk guy fucks you when you're drunk and unsure if you wanted to fuck him, and subsequent depression and traumatization and basically collapsing within on yourself is an acceptable or normal response to that... is absolutely insane.

at the end of the day, a grab on the ass or even a dick inside you, isn't a permanently damaging act. if you're not going to let a punch to the face dictate the rest of your life and your self-worth, why let a guy's touch do that? it's just temporary, physical contact - anything more is in your head. and the way our media and culture around us harps on and on and on about how "horrible" and "degrading" it is and all that bullshit makes it way worse than it actually is. it's not degrading - it was someone being an asshole to you in a world full of assholes. it's not special. it certainly isn't a problem that is only affecting women either. the only major difference is that men/boys are taught to believe that having sex is a "good" thing, regardless of whether you wanted to at the time or not, while girls are taught that it's a "shameful" thing. the reality is that it's neither.

don't listen to the hype. move the fuck on. that should be the main message, if anything. if someone punched me in the face, sure i'd be pissed, but i wouldn't keep thinking back on it again and again like it was the single most defining moment of my life. if someone raped me, or by god, had sex with me when i didn't want to, but i didn't say no either, i'm not going to fixate on that either. i'm going to live my life and keep making awesome memories worth remembering.

Click to expand...

Smallcock said:

Another take on things, that some here will find offensive.

http://www.unz.com/imercer/harvey-sweinstein-and-hollywoods-hos/

Click to expand...

oagre said:

Italian movie actress and director Asia Argento is facing pushback in her home country after speaking out about an alleged rape at the hands of disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein. While Argento’s courage in speaking about what happened to her was praised in Hollywood, and helped encourage at least 40 women to speak out about their own experiences of assault at the hands of Weinstein, public opinion in Italy has sided more with Weinstein than with Argento, according to Quartz’s Annalisa Merelli.

Merelli points out that the opinion writers have been remarkably bold in their condemnation of Argento and other actresses speaking out against sexual assault — former journalist and MP Renato Farina, for instance, has suggested that the assaults described by actresses are “prostitution, not rape.” Vittorio Feltri, editor in chief of Libero, a right wing populist newspaper, said that since Weinstein didn’t physically harm Argento that the sex must have been consensual — and that, if anything, Argento should be thankful to Weinstein for forcibly performing oral sex on her. Politician Vittorio Sgarbi went still further, arguing that Weinstein “was actually assaulted by her.”

Prominent Italian women have targeted Argento as well, questioning why she didn’t speak out earlier about the rape or claiming that she deserved what happened to her since she willingly visited Weinstein in his hotel room.

In wake of the public outcry against her, Argento has said that she is leaving Italy for Germany to escape the “climate of tension” and “victim blaming.”

“Italy,” Argento said, “is far behind the rest of the world in its view of women.”

In her article for Quartz, Merelli also shared a myriad of other misogynistic accusations leveled against Argento — including the disturbing reaction of Italian musician Morgan, who was Argento’s partner for seven years and had a daughter with her. All of this vitriol comes in a culture that was once presided over by former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, a man known for being a misogynist and someone who actually has much in common with the current U.S. president.



http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenint...-her-for-speaking-out-about-harvey-weinstein/

Click to expand...

canada-man said:

Click to expand...

canada-man said:

next on hollywood's covering up of rapes and paedophilia and other sexual misdeeds


Shortly after Harvey Weinstein's career — and life — imploded over sex allegations from more than 40 women, director Woody Allen came out to say he was "sad": Sad for the Hollywood movie mogul.

Now, the 81-year-old is in the news again with reports that his new movie contains scenes involving an older man having sex with young starlets.

"We’re told that a plotline in the untitled Allen flick, which is currently filming in New York, centers around a middle-aged man who is sleeping with a much younger woman, among other actresses, and, according to the script, 'makes a fool of himself over every ambitious starlet and model,'" the New York Post reports.

In scenes just filmed, a character played by Rebecca Hall accuses 44-year-old actor Jude Law’s character of having sex with a 15-year-old “concubine.” In the scene, the so-called concubine — played by Elle Fanning (19 in real life) — acknowledges her relationship with Law’s much-older character, but then protests that she is 21 years old. After a discussion about his infidelity, Fanning’s character then asks Law, “Were all these women for pleasure, or were you researching a project?” ...

The plot seems perversely timed, given the mounting allegations of sexual harassment and rape against Weinstein. In a further poignant play — since Allen has faced his own allegations of sexual misconduct (which he has strenuously denied) — the director himself recently became entangled in the Weinstein scandal.

The famed film director was roundly hammered this month after he said he felt "sad for Harvey that his life is so messed up."

Allen has faced his own sex charges. He was accused of sexually abusing his own daughter, Dylan Farrow. During Allen's messy split from Mia Farrow, Dylan alleged that she was abused when she was seven years old. While Allen was never criminally charged, presiding Justice Elliott Wilk wrote about the case that "credible testimony ... prove that Mr. Allen's behavior toward Dylan was grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her."

Allen, 81, has been super creepy for years. After dating Farrow for a decade, the actress in 1992 found nude pictures of her then-21-year-old adopted daughter, Soon-Yi Previn, taken by Allen. The couple split, and Previn, 46, and Allen are now married.

In a weird coincidence, Allen's own son, Ronan Farrow, is one of the reporters who investigated Weinstein for a major breaking story, speaking to 13 women who said the Hollywood producer had sexually harassed or assaulted them.

Allen said he had no idea about Weinstein, despite working with him on several films.

"No one ever came to me or told me horror stories with any real seriousness," Allen told the BBC. "And they wouldn't, because you are not interested in it. You are interested in making your movie."

http://www.dailywire.com/news/22580/makes-sense-woody-allens-new-movie-has-adult-teen-joseph-curl

Click to expand...

derrick76 said:

Milo Yiannopoulos’s Pedophilia Comments Cost Him CPAC Role and Book Deal

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/us/politics/cpac-milo-yiannopoulos.html

Click to expand...

derrick76 said:

Are O Reilly and Trump on Team Weinstein? They got his back?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41712527

Trump of course, needs no introduction.

Click to expand...