Seduction Spa
Toronto Escorts

The Trump Bashing Emmys Match Worst Ratings In Show’s History

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,096
2,592
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
The 69th Primetime Emmys spent three hours Sunday night attacking President Donald Trump and the show matched the historic low of the 2016 broadcast.

After, last year’s award show hosted by Jimmy Kimmel came in with the lowest numbers in the show’s history, early numbers from Nielsen data show that this year’s star-studded event hosted by Stephen Colbert did just as bad, according to a report Monday by Variety.

In the coveted adult demographic for ages 18-49, the award show in early numbers received only 2.2 million viewers, with 9.6 million total viewers Sunday night. In comparison, last year’s early numbers in the same demographic received 2.5 million viewers, and 9.7 million viewers overall. Those numbers were later adjusted to 2.8 million within the demographic, and 11.3 million for the entire audience. Final numbers for Sunday night were later adjusted showing a 2.5 rating for the demographic and 11.4 million viewers.

In 2015, the Emmys netted a 3.6 million viewers in the same demographic and 11.9 million viewers total for the star-studded show.

Because the broadcast aired live in both the East coast and West Coast time zones, the numbers were adjusted later in the day.

The program also earned 8.2 million viewers in metered market households, down two percent over the previous year.

Sunday night, the Emmys turned highly political from the opening musical number as the host and presenters took shots at the president mentioning the Russia investigation, treason, and global warming, to name a few. Even the former White House press secretary Sean Spicer made an appearance to mock himself from one of his press conferences about the size of Trump’s inauguration crowd.

Updated: This story has been updated to reflect the latest ratings numbers.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/18/the-trump-bashing-emmys-hit-new-low-worst-ratings-ever/
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Remaining smug while you lose, the left is perfecting this model.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,978
6,111
113
The 69th Primetime Emmys spent three hours Sunday night attacking President Donald Trump and the show matched the historic low of the 2016 broadcast.

After, last year’s award show hosted by Jimmy Kimmel came in with the lowest numbers in the show’s history, early numbers from Nielsen data show that this year’s star-studded event hosted by Stephen Colbert did just as bad, according to a report Monday by Variety.

In the coveted adult demographic for ages 18-49, the award show in early numbers received only 2.2 million viewers, with 9.6 million total viewers Sunday night. In comparison, last year’s early numbers in the same demographic received 2.5 million viewers, and 9.7 million viewers overall. Those numbers were later adjusted to 2.8 million within the demographic, and 11.3 million for the entire audience. Final numbers for Sunday night were later adjusted showing a 2.5 rating for the demographic and 11.4 million viewers.

In 2015, the Emmys netted a 3.6 million viewers in the same demographic and 11.9 million viewers total for the star-studded show.

Because the broadcast aired live in both the East coast and West Coast time zones, the numbers were adjusted later in the day.

The program also earned 8.2 million viewers in metered market households, down two percent over the previous year.

Sunday night, the Emmys turned highly political from the opening musical number as the host and presenters took shots at the president mentioning the Russia investigation, treason, and global warming, to name a few. Even the former White House press secretary Sean Spicer made an appearance to mock himself from one of his press conferences about the size of Trump’s inauguration crowd.

Updated: This story has been updated to reflect the latest ratings numbers.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/18/the-trump-bashing-emmys-hit-new-low-worst-ratings-ever/
Are you suggesting that people did not tune in because they were anticipating Trump bashing?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,096
2,592
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Box-office eclipse: Hollywood has worst weekend in 16 years

NEW YORK — Hollywood effectively took the weekend off, resulting in one of the most dismal box-office results in 16 years.

An already slow August came to a screeching halt at the multiplex, where no major new releases were unveiled. That left the Samuel L. Jackson-Ryan Reynolds action-comedy The Hitman's Bodyguard to top all films for the second week, with an estimated $10.1 million in ticket sales.

But the entire slate of films grossed only about $65 million in North America and the top 12 films generated just $49.6 million. There have been similarly slow weekends in recent years, including early September in 2014 and in 2016. But not since September 2001 have the numbers been quite so dreadful.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...llywood-has-worst-weekend-16-years/606177001/


may be because there are no Marvel Cinematic Universe movies currently showing?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
It's the condescension of the elites, including the Hollywood clowns, that will propel Trump to the second term victory. The man is blessed by having enemies that go out of their way to insult a good portion of the American electorate. You'd think that they would learn something from the election campaign, but those shmucks, for all their money and fame, are the most politically tone deaf group I've ever seen.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,773
3
0
The Southern California based Entertainment Industry, is seriously disconnected from a majority of the U.S. population.

Just one example are the Film and Television types who feel that Handmaid's Tale is realistic and serious political commentary, never mind that over three decades later it shows no more signs of coming to pass than it did in 1985..
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,777
17,584
113
It's the condescension of the elites, including the Hollywood clowns, that will propel Trump to the second term victory. The man is blessed by having enemies that go out of their way to insult a good portion of the American electorate. You'd think that they would learn something from the election campaign, but those shmucks, for all their money and fame, are the most politically tone deaf group I've ever seen.
Really?
Are you that unaware of the people that Trump has bashed?
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
38,100
6,429
113
I wouldn't entirely dismiss jcpro's assertions.

The Hollywood elite are incredibly arrogant, self -absorbed and most of all stupid. They cost Hillary the election. Take the example of that noble hypocrite George Clooney. He's been feuding with Steve Bannon for years, recently Bannon offered a truce. Not only did Clooney reject it he publicly humiliated him. Arrogance prevails, he should have accepted, someone like that could be useful. As Machiavelli said, keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

Not all Hollywood actors are arrogant and stupid. Here's an example of one that isn't - as far removed from his series persona as one could be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jskFXOHLyBY
 

Calgacus

Banned
Feb 14, 2013
840
5
0
It's the condescension of the elites, including the Hollywood clowns, that will propel Trump to the second term victory. The man is blessed by having enemies that go out of their way to insult a good portion of the American electorate. You'd think that they would learn something from the election campaign, but those shmucks, for all their money and fame, are the most politically tone deaf group I've ever seen.
This is spot on.

Would anyone be surprised to see Trump again lose the popular vote but win the Presidency? Personally I think 74 is too old to run but giving a middle finger to "coastal elites" is a strong motivation
 

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,591
1,194
113
It's the condescension of the elites, including the Hollywood clowns, that will propel Trump to the second term victory. The man is blessed by having enemies that go out of their way to insult a good portion of the American electorate. You'd think that they would learn something from the election campaign, but those shmucks, for all their money and fame, are the most politically tone deaf group I've ever seen.
I agree, Trump's biggest advantage is a Democratic party that has gone out of its way to tell men and white people they don't give a shit about them.

Really?
Are you that unaware of the people that Trump has bashed?
Trump insults minorities. There are, by definition, less of them.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Really?
Are you that unaware of the people that Trump has bashed?
Yeah, foreigners, illegals and his fellow A listers in the media and politics. All great targets.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Yeah, foreigners, illegals and his fellow A listers in the media and politics. All great targets.
Trump has never been an A-lister; it's what he's always wanted to be, without knowing how to do the work.

It's why he went from cheating people in property development, to fleecing them in Casinos, to lying for money on reality-TV, to politics wher you lie all the time. All the applause makes him feel like he's won something, but alone at night he knows it's all been a sham: From the multiple bankruptcies, to his name coming off his developments, to the election even he knew was rigged, none of it was 'earned'.

To quote a famous Twit: So Sad!
 

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
10,851
2,085
113
Are you suggesting that people did not tune in because they were anticipating Trump bashing?
This was the obvious flaw in the ' Trump bashing' leads to poor ratings theory - nobody knew what they were watching unless they tuned in which would immediately boost the ratings.

Since SNL and late talk shows have boomed from bashing Trump - it could lead to a ratings boost next year if Trump hasn't been impeached yet.

If one remembers that the majority of voters voted against Trump who has now become the most unpopular president in history - those few delusional followers of this narcissistic buffoon should realise that humour is all we have left.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
23,932
3,679
113
I think all of you who think that the low ratings are some sort of indictment passed by the masses against the "Hollywood elites" are being just plain silly.

Back 20 years ago, TV was all about the 3 major networks and their various public offerings. Today, there are more channels with more content competing for a fixed number of viewers than ever. In short, people have way more choice than ever and an award show? Well, been there done that haven't we.

It's not some sort of indictment for Trump or against "elites" (getting tired of that label I am). Sorry. It's simply the new reality of a thousand channels or more.

Case in point, me.

I could not tell you the last time I watched a TV show on any of the regular networks (i.e. CBS, NBC, ABC, or even the CBC, City TV, or Global). Not a single one. In fact, I'd be hard pressed to name a single TV show other than "Big Bang Theory". Yet I do watch TV, but it's usually, TMN, Netflix, the News, or the odd show on a specialty channel. I could not even tell you where on my Bell Fibe dial I would even find CBS, NBC, or ABC.

This is the new TV reality. Fuck, not Trump. I fucking hate Trump and everything about that circus side show mad man and pathological liar. But that didn't make me tune in and watch the Emmys. Hell, I didn't even know they were on.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
I think all of you who think that the low ratings are some sort of indictment passed by the masses against the "Hollywood elites" are being just plain silly.

Back 20 years ago, TV was all about the 3 major networks and their various public offerings. Today, there are more channels with more content competing for a fixed number of viewers than ever. In short, people have way more choice than ever and an award show? Well, been there done that haven't we.

It's not some sort of indictment for Trump or against "elites" (getting tired of that label I am). Sorry. It's simply the new reality of a thousand channels or more.

Case in point, me.

I could not tell you the last time I watched a TV show on any of the regular networks (i.e. CBS, NBC, ABC, or even the CBC, City TV, or Global). Not a single one. In fact, I'd be hard pressed to name a single TV show other than "Big Bang Theory". Yet I do watch TV, but it's usually, TMN, Netflix, the News, or the odd show on a specialty channel. I could not even tell you where on my Bell Fibe dial I would even find CBS, NBC, or ABC.

This is the new TV reality. Fuck, not Trump. I fucking hate Trump and everything about that circus side show mad man and pathological liar. But that didn't make me tune in and watch the Emmys. Hell, I didn't even know they were on.
Absolutely. The evolution of TV sources has meant a huge proliferation of shows which is great for those who make them, like us here in TO. But as often as not, that means not only is the Emmy category mystifying — Best Female Guest in a Recurring Role — but it may well be put out by a source you've never encountered, or come from a show you never heard of.

Which leaves nip slips, tongue fumbles and phony 'surprises' like Sean Spicer being as earnestly irrelevant on stage as at the White House, as the only reasons to watch at all.

No thanks. Trump's not to blame for this one (and he never won an Emmy either)
 
Toronto Escorts