Sexy Friends Toronto
Toronto Escorts

Sanders' single-payer push splits Democrats

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
That is a far flung conclusion you are drawing.

And I can't speak for the captain but the numbers seem to undermine your bragging about how good the US system is.
I used your per capital healthcare costs and JTK's comment:

But here's the thing.

Universal Health care would cost Americans less.

You currently pay twice was Canadians pay. This is an empirical fact. And for that, you do not have Universal Health Care.

So why not instead of paying Insurance Companies, the program be administered by the Government. Your costs would decrease and everyone would have health care.

Insurance companies are the true Fat cats in all of this in the USA. Eliminate them from the equation, reduce costs, and everyone has health care.
I don't think cutting out the insurance companies would cut all the costs, the states that have opted out of private exchanges and expanded Medicare are dependent on Federal money to keep it going.

One of the reasons our costs are higher is that we pay doctors more. We pay doctors more like we pay all highly successful people more. We also have silly levels of capacity for convienience.

Sorry, I know this is getting to complex for most of you.....
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
... We pay doctors more like we pay all highly successful people more. We also have silly levels of capacity for convienience.
....
People who can afford it, those with money and those working at a company that purchases a good plan benefit. Those without suffer. And no matter how much you like to pretend otherwise, those on medicare don't have the same level of access.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
People who can afford it, those with money and those working at a company that purchases a good plan benefit. Those without suffer. And no matter how much you like to pretend otherwise, those on medicare don't have the same level of access.
While those who don't qualify for medicare or medicaid have even less. And drive America's overly-costly outcome stats into the basement.

The real question is why the US doesn't go for better outcomes with more money in everyone's pocket — except maybe some doctors and hospital corporations — by simply importing a proven working model from any one of a number of countries where people are healthier and live longer.

The savings could finance a considerable tax-refund, or programs to build hospitals in under-serviced areas or to train more doctors, nurse-practitioners and mid-wives. Or what ever. It wouldn't cost a cent more, and fewer babies would die.

Just takes political will. Not a GOP quality, apparently
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Many do, mine do.
Because we work for employers big enough that they can get a good plan for their employees. Self employed people, and employees of small businesses, cannot get those kinda of plans for anything close to the premiums we and our employers get.

Corporate plans in the US are generally quite good.

But it sucks for everyone else.

A good solution would be to automatically extend Medicare to everyone not covered by a corporate plan. Keep your plan. Let people in small businesses pool together into a big enough population that they can get good coverage.

Also replace COBRA with automatic migration to the Medicare plan if you lose your job.

People can be charged a premium. A good way to do that would be to impose a healthcare tax on everyone but grant tax credits for premiums paid to a private plan so that effectively it's no new tax on you if you already pay the premium through work but otherwise everyone's automatically included.

Medicare then becomes a baseline and your employer can provide you with a better, premium plan as a perk.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Roughly speaking, fuji, you have described how our healthcare plan was brought in. We were required to pay premiums directly if we didn't have a payroll or group plan, but they were deductible at tax time, and that got everyone on the same minimal footing.

Those without the means could apply for premium assistance. Employers continued to use good insurance to attract and keep employees. With everyone covered and cash moving, it was straightforward accounting to see what it all cost. Eventually it was obvious that simply eliminating separate premiums and rolling those same amounts into taxes would save everyone time trouble and paperwork, without infringing anyone's ability to buy or offer a better plan. And because all that was known to be in the works, but over an extended period, the insurance industry and its employees adjusted without too much turmoil.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts