Climate Fraud Exposed: CO2 Doesn’t Rise Up, Trap And Retain Heat

So fuji,...you calling me dumb in responding to somebody else's post,...what a brave little man,...???


You are an ASS,...and incapable of responding to my posts with anything other than childish insults and lies,...and continuing confirmation you don't have a fucking clue what you copy and past,...and have the integrity of a diarrhea soaked sponge.

So unless you respond with something other than childish insults, lies,...STFU.

FAST said:

So fuji,...you calling me dumb in responding to somebody else's post,...what a brave little man,...???


You are an ASS,...and incapable of responding to my posts with anything other than childish insults and lies,...and continuing confirmation you don't have a fucking clue what you copy and past,...and have the integrity of a diarrhea soaked sponge.

So unless you respond with something other than childish insults, lies,...STFU.

Click to expand...

All sputter. No content.

fuji said:

All sputter. No content.

Click to expand...

You are an ASS,...and incapable of responding to my posts with anything other than childish insults and lies,...and continuing confirmation you don't have a fucking clue what you copy and past,...and have the integrity of a diarrhea soaked sponge.

THAT,...is content,...and more truthful than anything you post.

Want some more content,...its becoming more and more obvious, as some one else already posted,...you suffer from the short man syndrome.

Its NOT anybody's here's fault fuji,...you were just born that way,...so you can call me dumb all you want,...but it doesn't change what you are.

canada-man said:

continue to display your scientific illiteracy

Click to expand...

So you are trying to claim that the science of gravity is settled. That's as stupid a statement as when you claimed CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas or when you had to look up basic scientific terms in an online dictionary.

All things must pass, except for this thread, which is everlasting!

FAST said:

You are an ASS,...and incapable of responding to my posts with anything other than childish insults and lies,...and continuing confirmation you don't have a fucking clue what you copy and past,...and have the integrity of a diarrhea soaked sponge.

THAT,...is content,...and more truthful than anything you post.

Want some more content,...its becoming more and more obvious, as some one else already posted,...you suffer from the short man syndrome.

Its NOT anybody's here's fault fuji,...you were just born that way,...so you can call me dumb all you want,...but it doesn't change what you are.

Click to expand...

All sputter. No content.

Lots of content,...

fuji said:

All sputter. No content.

Click to expand...

You are an ASS,...and incapable of responding to my posts with anything other than childish insults and lies,...and continuing confirmation you don't have a fucking clue what you copy and past,...and have the integrity of a diarrhea soaked sponge.

THAT,...is content,...and more truthful than anything you post.

Want some more content,...its becoming more and more obvious, as some one else already posted,...you suffer from the short man syndrome.

Its NOT anybody's here's fault fuji,...you were just born that way,...so you can call me dumb all you want,...but it doesn't change what you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will be watching to see if you actually respond to one of my posts on the subject in this thread,...without a childish insult,...but actually with some content relative to the thread.

Not holding my breath yet,...because it hasn't happened once.

fuji said:

Keep arguing against the scientific method. You increasingly reveal yourself to be as dumb so FAST.

Click to expand...

For the eighth time I am not arguing against what nature published, just your incorrect interpretation

The Nature article proved that atmospheric CO2 causes global warming.

Click to expand...

I noticed you changed what you now claim they proved, dropping the man made portion
How Fuji like

We have lots of other studies which show where that CO2 came from.

Click to expand...

So you say, too bad they did not include this in your Holy Grail "nature"

If your only defence is it might not be man made you've lost.

Click to expand...

ha Ha! You lost the second you started throwing around "undebatable" and "beyond any mathematically plausible doubt"
Speaking of losing you did not answer the question

So explain to us under what scenario "beyond any mathematically plausible doubt" does not equate to 100% absolute certainty?
You have already said 100% absolute certainty is not possible

PS, the boys at NASA would lose their toys if they relied on the false Newton's law since they deal with speeds and distances at which relatively becomes important.

Click to expand...

"False Newton's law" ????? Really?
Sir Isaac wold be so disappointed

Too bad relativity only becomes important when approaching the speed of light
now I know you are fascinated by shinny things and the space rockets do move very fast, however their velocity is minuscule vs the speed of light and as such they are still governed by Sir Isaacs law and must overcome gravity

Fuji the Fool sitting in the corner wearing his dunce cap

JohnLarue said:

For the eighth time I am not arguing against what nature published, just your incorrect interpretation

Click to expand...

There's no interpretation: they directly proved that atmospheric CO2 is warming the planet and that the rate is warming is exactly the rate predicted by the models.

We know from other studies, which I can link, that the atmospheric CO2 increase is the result of human activity and therefore the increased warming the result of human activity.

So explain to us under what scenario "beyond any mathematically plausible doubt" does not equate to 100% absolute certainty?

Click to expand...

I'm quite content if you are agreeing that global warming is proved beyond a mathematical doubt. That's an accurate statement. Most people would just say that's proved.

"False Newton's law" ????? Really?
Sir Isaac wold be so disappointed

Click to expand...

Maybe it's news to you but It was famously proven wrong by Einstein.

Have a faction create a model of a planet's response to a claimed 1% of less than .04% of the planets atmosphere, then have that same faction prove the model is correct

Sorta like having an alcoholic night watch man at the LCBO.

Yep,...I'd stake billions and countries economies on that scenario.

FAST said:

Have a faction create a model of a planet's response to a claimed 1% of less than .04% of the planets atmosphere, then have that same faction prove the model is correct

Sorta like having an alcoholic night watch man at the LCBO.

Yep,...I'd stake billions and countries economies on that scenario.

Click to expand...

^^^^^ senile mutter

fuji is nothing,...if not predictable,...

As predicted, and right on schedule, there you have confirmation once again that fuji can't post anything other than a childish insult.

But as to be expected.

FAST said:

As predicted, and right on schedule, there you have confirmation once again that fuji can't post anything other than a childish insult.

But as to be expected.

Click to expand...

Your posts are increasingly incoherent. If you haven't already done so go in for a check-up and inquire after the symptoms of dementia. Apparently there are a variety of treatments these days so you may be able to slow the progression of the disease.

FAST said:

Have a faction create a model of a planet's response to a claimed 1% of less than .04% of the planets atmosphere, then have that same faction prove the model is correct
....

Click to expand...

I love this argument. Would you be happy ingesting 0.04% of your weight in arsenic? Dioxin? Mercury?

basketcase said:

I love this argument. Would you be happy ingesting 0.04% of your weight in arsenic? Dioxin? Mercury?

Click to expand...

Arsenic, dioxin and mercury are quite toxic at very low concentrations (ppm??)
Co2 is toxic when it approaches 100 times normal atmospheric concentration

That's quite a difference

While your argument appears startling and meaningful at first glance, it is not really a good analogy

fuji said:

I'm quite content if you are agreeing that global warming is proved beyond a mathematical doubt. That's an accurate statement. Most people would just say that's proved.

Click to expand...

I am not agreeing as beyond a mathematical doubt implies 100% absolute certainty and that is simply not the case and as you say that is impossible

The timeline of recorded temperature relative to the history of an ever evolving plant which is 4.5 Billion years old is evidence enough that there is significant mathematical doubt

Extrapolating short term data certainly introduces the potential for errors

where did you take science class ?
home schooling ?

JohnLarue said:

I am not agreeing as beyond a mathematical doubt implies 100% absolute certainty and that is simply not the case and as you say that is impossible

The timeline of recorded temperature relative to the history of an ever evolving plant which is 4.5 Billion years old is evidence enough that there is significant mathematical doubt

Extrapolating short term data certainly introduces the potential for errors

where did you take science class ?
home schooling ?

Click to expand...

There is no doubt that CO2 in the atmosphere is warming the planet. We know the exact amount of warming per square foot it's causing. The Nature study measured it.

Arguing against a simple fact like that makes you as dumb as FAST.

fuji is nothing,...if not predicatable,...

fuji said:

Your posts are increasingly incoherent. If you haven't already done so go in for a check-up and inquire after the symptoms of dementia. Apparently there are a variety of treatments these days so you may be able to slow the progression of the disease.

Click to expand...

As predicted, and right on schedule, there you have confirmation once again that fuji can't post anything other than a childish insult.

But as to be expected.

basketcase said:

I love this argument. Would you be happy ingesting 0.04% of your weight in arsenic? Dioxin? Mercury?

Click to expand...

I love this argument.

Your solution is to remove ALL of the CO2 in the atmosphere,...of which CO2 is .04%

fuji said:

There is no doubt that CO2 in the atmosphere is warming the planet..

Click to expand...

Hear that folks,...CO2 is "warming" the atmosphere,...who knew,...but as fuji states,...NOT increasing the planets temperature though,...just "warming" the planet.

.

We know the exact amount of warming per square foot it's causing. The Nature study measured it.

Click to expand...

And once again with the "exact" bull shit,...just how accurate is "exact" fuji,...???

There is no way in hell some nature magazine can prove how man's contribution of CO2 "exactly" effects the temperature of the planet,...to accept that,...one would have to be brain washed.

Also what's with the "We" bull shit,...has your discredited nature magazine renamed itself the "We" magazine,...???