Toronto Escorts

Climate Fraud Exposed: CO2 Doesn’t Rise Up, Trap And Retain Heat

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Where did I say controlling? Reread my post a few times with the aid of a dictionary until you understand it.

We have been warming the planet, not controlling it.
Have to get a couple of things clarified here from you fuji.

1st,...Could you explain the fuji time scale for us,...

,..."LOOOONG",...is the amount of years relative to the number of O's in LOOOONG in your system,...in other words,...does one O = 10 years,...so your statement of LOOOONG before 1750 means 1710,...or is each O = 100 years,...so man started controlling the planets temp. in 1350,...???

Inquiring minds want to know.

2nd,...You have stated that man has been warming the planet LOOOONG before 1750,...and is still currently doing so.

Now your self proclaimed unemployable experts want man to stop warming the planet,...but you state we can't control the temp. of the planet,...so its simply all BULL SHIT fuji,...as you have stated,...we can't stop the planets temp. from rising,...because we,...."are not controlling it"
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Easy to discuss.

In post 56 you are making a ridiculous hypothetical question.

In reality, moisture content in the atmosphere is directly related to temperature. As temperature increases, more water evaporates. An increase in CO2 causes the temperature to increase. This is an empirically demonstrated fact. Increased CO2 caused increased temperature which causes increased water vapor which creates a positive feedback loop.
By Jove,...I think you've got it.

The planet warms naturally,...as it has,...numerous times in the past,...water vapour is increased,...which creates a "feed back loop".

"Feed back loop",... an increase in the planets temp = more water vapour = which increases in the planets temp = more water vapour,...etc., etc.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
By Jove,...I think you've got it.

The planet warms naturally,...as it has,...numerous times in the past,...water vapour is increased,...which creates a "feed back loop".

"Feed back loop",... an increase in the planets temp = more water vapour = which increases in the planets temp = more water vapour,...etc., etc.
You are a genius. The planet is doomed.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Have to get a couple of things clarified here from you fuji.

1st,...Could you explain the fuji time scale for us,...

,..."LOOOONG",...is the amount of years relative to the number of O's in LOOOONG in your system,...in other words,...does one O = 10 years,...so your statement of LOOOONG before 1750 means 1710,...or is each O = 100 years,...so man started controlling the planets temp. in 1350,...???

Inquiring minds want to know.

2nd,...You have stated that man has been warming the planet LOOOONG before 1750,...and is still currently doing so.

Now your self proclaimed unemployable experts want man to stop warming the planet,...but you state we can't control the temp. of the planet,...so its simply all BULL SHIT fuji,...as you have stated,...we can't stop the planets temp. from rising,...because we,...."are not controlling it"
Nowhere did I say we are controlling it. Nowhere. That's your made up statement to create a straw man to argue with.

I said we have been warming the planet, and we have. CO2 results in warming.

In the past when we produced small amounts of CO2 the degree of warming was outweighed by other factors. Now our CO2 emissions have reached the point where they are a dominant factor.

Next time try comprehending my post before you reply and don't attribute to me words I didn't use.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Most climate change "scientists" would disagree with you. They fully acknowledge that until about 1850 co2 was not even a greenhouse gas and that it lagged behind temperature. But apparently that all changed when humans upset the "equilibrium" of 280-300ppm.
Incorrect. Scientists have known for 200 years or so that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Scientists may discuss how before 1850, CO2 levels were low enough that it did not have a significant negative impact on the global environment.

But of course you still believe that there is some nasty conspiracy of scientists so I don't know why you even bother mentioning them.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
So I guess when a republican is linked to child porn or other criminal charges it means that the entire party is fake. Good to know.
you are starting to get irritating
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
you fail!
Actually you failed when you comically failed to account for wind and you failed when you absurdly thought a low capacity to store heat was incompatible with emitting blackbody radiation. You also failed comically when you claimed CO2 couldn't absorb light in the infrared spectrum because it's transparent in the visible spectrum.

This thread has been a disaster for you.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,152
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Actually you failed when you comically failed to account for wind and you failed when you absurdly thought a low capacity to store heat was incompatible with emitting blackbody radiation. You also failed comically when you claimed CO2 couldn't absorb light in the infrared spectrum because it's transparent in the visible spectrum.

This thread has been a disaster for you.

no you and your clone basketcase are the only ones that use insults and name calling and then declaring you win.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
no you and your clone basketcase are the only ones that use insults and name calling and then declaring you win.
Actually we are the ones explaining basic science and common sense to you. You have no answer to:

1. Wind mixes the atmosphere
2. CO2 is opaque to infrared light
3. It's low capacity to store heat is why it emits heat

Note, no name calling here, just facts you got wrong.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Whaddya know? Yet another peer-reviewed paper has been published in Nature confirming that there has been a "hiatus" in the Earth's temperature -- completely different from what the computer models predicted.

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep31789
It confirms a slowdown overall AND the models are for CLIMATE CHANGE, whereas this article discussed the weather, a period of only 15 years.

You still don't grok the difference.

The shorter you make the time interval the less accurate predictions will be. A thirty year prediction is more accurate than a fifteen year one or a monthly prediction.

Most of your posts are based on failing to understand what the word climate means (it means thirty year average).
 
Toronto Escorts