I took the quiz just to see what the survey said. It was discouraging to find that 24% of Canadians were "ultra globalists" - essentially people who could see no downside to globalist policies. Sort of says it all for the flagging Canadian economy.More details on the quiz and how Canadians scored.
http://abacusdata.ca/globalism-and-nationalism-in-canada/
It appears that I am an ultra globalist. I don't really agree with characterization but apparently I am. Go figure. Ultra or not I do agree that free or freer trade has been a net positive for Canada.I took the quiz just to see what the survey said. It was discouraging to find that 24% of Canadians were "ultra globalists" - essentially people who could see no downside to globalist policies. Sort of says it all for the flagging Canadian economy.
Where's your evidence for that? Certainly can't be deduced from this simplistic and rather biased survey about immigration.I took the quiz just to see what the survey said. It was discouraging to find that 24% of Canadians were "ultra globalists" - essentially people who could see no downside to globalist policies. Sort of says it all for the flagging Canadian economy.
You are full of shit. Since you don't even live in Canada, why do you blight this thread? Is it merely to add more posts to your total?I think if a poll tells you that you are an ultra nationalist, that should be a wake up call that you've become a bigot.
Let's go through the questions. Some are just factual:You are full of shit. Since you don't even live in Canada, why do you blight this thread? Is it merely to add more posts to your total?
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?386465-Shooting-at-Eaton-CentreI think if a poll tells you that you are an ultra nationalist, that should be a wake up call that you've become a bigot.
So how black is black if you're proposing to punish them all until they shape up? Here's an easy chart with a mere 66 shades. Tell us where precisely you'd put the divider that sends some folks to your Compulsory Re-Education Centres, and lets others — say a John Wayne Gacey or a Paul Bernardo, or a Whitman, Klebold or Lanza — walk the streets.https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?386465-Shooting-at-Eaton-Centre
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=4065993#post4065993
Actually I don't agree. Even those members of the black community who are not engaging in crime appear to support the criminal ethos. In other words, they glamorize the thug lifestyle and that contributes to crime. Therefore the majority really ought to be penalized, until they shape up.
every time you cry bigot i will bring up your racisms
those are fuji's quotes take it up with him.So how black is black if you're proposing to punish them all until they shape up? Here's an easy chart with a mere 66 shades. Tell us where precisely you'd put the divider that sends some folks to your Compulsory Re-Education Centres, and lets others — say a John Wayne Gacey or a Paul Bernardo, or a Whitman, Klebold or Lanza — walk the streets.
The astounding thing is that you're unashamed to post this discreditable nastiness and imagine you're making any point about bigotry, beyond how extreme and stupid an example you can think up.
My finger's over the Ignore button, but I have asked for a reply
Then your irresponsible failure to label the quote you posted as as a quote is giving you and me this bit of grief now:those are fuji's quotes take it up with him.
And every time you bring this up you FLEE FROM THE DEBATE. Context here so people can see how cowardly and dishonest you are:https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?386465-Shooting-at-Eaton-Centre
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=4065993#post4065993
Actually I don't agree. Even those members of the black community who are not engaging in crime appear to support the criminal ethos. In other words, they glamorize the thug lifestyle and that contributes to crime. Therefore the majority really ought to be penalized, until they shape up.
every time you cry bigot i will bring up your racisms
He's taken my comment out of context because he's a troll.So how black is black if you're proposing to punish them all until they shape up? Here's an easy chart with a mere 66 shades. Tell us where precisely you'd put the divider that sends some folks to your Compulsory Re-Education Centres, and lets others — say a John Wayne Gacey or a Paul Bernardo, or a Whitman, Klebold or Lanza — walk the streets.
The astounding thing is that you're unashamed to post this discreditable nastiness and imagine you're making any point about bigotry, beyond how extreme and stupid an example you can think up.
My finger's over the Ignore button, but I have asked for a reply