ACTUAL SCIENTIST: "Climate Change is a Scam!"
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
Sure. Does Al Gore know about your theory of anthropogenic global "cooling"? :biggrin1:Try again. I'll bait you out a few more times before I skewer you.
Nor was one mentioned in the article you can't comprehend.Sure. Does Al Gore know about your theory of anthropogenic global "cooling"? :biggrin1:
That has been proven so many times, I just assumed most did not have any doubtsIt has now been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Fuji doesn't know what he's talking about.
Says the guy who has lost EVERY debate, such as the time you claimed selling oil for USD would require borrowing in USD.That has been proven so many times, I just assumed most did not have any doubts
So show us all those scientists who published about AGW who later abandoned the conclusion that CO2 is a major player in climate change.What ??
Start by publishing a paper saying man made Co2 is roasting the planet, then later publishing one saying "hold on, it may be the variances in the planets orbit which are causing global warning" ?...
Because these aren't preachers interpreting an eclipse or an irregular liver as a sign of the end times. They are scientists looking at the best evidence currently available.Throughout history preachers and others have been predicting doom, and followers have been repeating their facts. And it never happened.
How can you be so sure they have it right this time?...
And yes, some scientists make flaky predictions but the consensus disagrees with them.
When even the graphs you posted had the observed data within the predicted range for almost every year...I admit no such thing.
Indeed, I can come up with explanations other than the "conspiracy theory" nonsense to explain how someone who's passionately committed to AGW could look at the data and somehow conclude that the models "did a good job."
....
Says a guy who quotes a paper that supports AGW as a major factor to prove AGW isn't a major factor.Once again, Fuji cites a paper he doesn't understand.....
The scientists who publish papers aren't politicized. The vast majority of them are interested in scientific discovery for the sake of discovery.A good starting point would be to try to de-politicize the issue by scrapping the United Nations' International Panel on Climate Change. The goal should be to take the political and economic agendas out of the discussion and focus on science.
Then again you are the guy who quoted Naomi Klein as an climate expert.
Even a broken clock is correct on occasion.That has been proven so many times, I just assumed most did not have any doubts
Why are you referring a magazine that publishes faulty, actually fraudulent articles,...which also confirms that its peer review process of anonymous reviewers,...is obviously more peer pressure,...than peer reviewing,...which is hilarious in it self.
Do you have any idea how stupid you look making this argument? Please cut and paste my words back to the thread to prove to everyone what a troll you are.Why are you referring a magazine that publishes faulty, actually fraudulent articles,...which also confirms that its peer review process of anonymous reviewers,...is obviously more peer pressure,...than peer reviewing,...which is hilarious in it self.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature14240.htmlCould care less what you think,...you do realze that you are used as an insult here on terb fuji.
So there is nothing that you can post,... that carries any weight in any debate here,...none.
Your criticisms of Nature actually exclude you from serious debate which is why I'm content to laugh at you.
???? Look it up yourself ????So show us all those scientists who published about AGW who later abandoned the conclusion that CO2 is a major player in climate change.
you asked
Look at the questionSo why don't they publish different views? My experience with academia requires people to publish NEW ideas. If there was sufficient evidence for other theories they would be published.
I answered with a plausible explanation why they (academia) do not publish different views
You miss-read that statement.Originally Posted by JohnLarue
What ??
Start by publishing a paper saying man made Co2 is roasting the planet, then later publishing one saying "hold on, it may be the variances in the planets orbit which are causing global warning" ?...
You think I was accusing the envior warriors of flip flopping on what they believe about Global warming
That is not what I meant
WowCould care less what you think,...you do realze that you are used as an insult here on terb fuji.
So there is nothing that you can post,... that carries any weight in any debate here,...none.
I seem to recall Fuji ratting me out to the mods for insulting him. (twice)
I got banned too
I guess it is his dumb luck that everyone else is grown up and would never stoop so low as to tattle tail on him
Just another childish fuji insult post,...
Could care less what you think,...you do realze that you are used as an insult here on terb fuji.
So there is nothing that you can post,... that carries any weight in any debate here,...none.
Your magazine has been proven to publish fraudulent articles,...which make your magazine,... a fraud.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature14240.html
Your criticisms of Nature actually exclude you from serious debate which is why I'm content to laugh at you.
Could care less what you think,...you do realze that you are used as an insult here on terb fuji.
So there is nothing that you can post,... that carries any weight in any debate here,...none.
Your magazine has been proven to publish fraudulent articles,...which make your magazine,... a fraud.
Nature is the most highly respected scientific journal there is. Your post is kooky!Could care less what you think,...you do realze that you are used as an insult here on terb fuji.
So there is nothing that you can post,... that carries any weight in any debate here,...none.
Your magazine has been proven to publish fraudulent articles,...which make your magazine,... a fraud.
You switched to insults after you got thrashed on the facts. That's why you got banned.Wow
I seem to recall Fuji ratting me out to the mods for insulting him. (twice)
I got banned too
I guess it is his dumb luck that everyone else is grown up and would never stoop so low as to tattle tail on him
