Toronto Escorts

Cut City of Toronto funding for GAY PRIDE - Toronto Councillor

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
23,939
3,701
113
Coun. John Campbell says Pride Toronto’s grant request should be voted down until the city’s Pride parade returns to its “core principals of equity and inclusivity.”

By BRETT BUNDALEThe Canadian Press
Tues., March 28, 2017
Amid mounting controversy over police participation in pride events across the country, a Toronto city councillor is calling for a municipal donation to Canada’s largest Pride parade to be cut after the event banned police floats from future festivities.

Coun. John Campbell said about half a dozen councillors so far agree that Pride Toronto’s annual grant request, expected in April, should be voted down until the city’s Pride parade returns to its “core principals of equity and inclusivity.”

“It doesn’t sit right with me and with other councillors that we issue this grant in view of the position that they’ve taken with respect to the police force,” he said Tuesday. “We need a certain level of equity and inclusivity attached to the issuance of grants for organizations.”

In a surprise move at its annual general meeting in January, Pride Toronto adopted a list of demands issued by the Toronto chapter of Black Lives Matter, including banning police floats from the parade.

Members of the anti-racism activist group held a sit in part way through the city’s annual Pride parade last July, stopping it from moving forward for about a half hour, until Pride organizers signed the list of demands. Black Lives Matter said it opposed police presence in the parade because it could discourage marginalized communities from participating.

“Black Lives Matter bullied Pride into making a decision that I don’t think was in the best interests of the city,” Campbell said.

Janaya Khan, co-founder of the group’s Toronto chapter, said the councillor did not understand race relations.

“What is missing is a real understanding of what it means to be a racialized person in this city, and the fear that exists in your body when you are around a police officer,” Khan said. “The institution of policing discriminates people based on race. We actually wouldn’t need to exist if city councillors were doing their job.”

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/20...t-for-pride-parade-axed-after-police-ban.html
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
23,939
3,701
113
I don't know who John Campbell is. But I agree with him 100%.

If Gay Pride wants to ban the TPS from participating in Gay Pride, to have their exclusive club, then Gay Pride's City of Toronto funding should be axed to the tune of 100 percent.

Good on Campbell.

I'm all for Gay Pride festivities. Been to the parade a few times myself. Always an interesting time out and everyone having fun. And I fully support Gay Pride if they feel it necessary to capitulate to Black Lives Matter on this issue. I get it. But damned if they think they are entitled to tax dollars if they are not being inclusive. The TPS has come a long way in its acceptance of homosexuals. A long way. The TPS is part of the broader community whether or not some people like that or not. We all need to get along. They are not perfect, but they try their best and God loves a tryer as they say.

So cool if Gay Pride wants to ban police participation. But they should not be allowed to have their cake and eat it too. No more free money. And on top of that, they can now pay for security, road occupancy permits, and most of all clean up from the event.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,814
3,468
113
BLM basically hijacked Pride as a ready made political forum they could use for their own agenda. They don't give a rat's ass about LBGTQ issues.

I expect something to go quite wrong with this year's parade. They are going to fuck it up somehow, lose sponsors, and divide the community.

Which is what they want. It's how they make money.
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,751
511
113
If the city of Toronto wanted to make a statement they would just not issue a permit for this year's parade and cancel it. But that would take balls and I don't think Toronto council has enough guts to make a stand.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
,..."Khan said. “The institution of policing discriminates people based on race"

A pretty strong, and stupid statement,...does NOTHING to help what ever issue there may be,...but not uncommon today.

FAST
 

dirkd101

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2005
10,320
70
48
eastern frontier
Agreed about BLM hijacking the parade and taking away from what it is, a celebration.

Good for council if they follow through and cut the funding. Force the organizers to shut BLM out and allow the men and women in blue join the parade. They have many members who are a part of that community.
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,685
1,199
113
Toronto
These councillors are inflaming Pride's problem with Black Lives Matter because they're against both groups. They never supported Pride to begin with.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,887
239
63
This is a case where both groups are doing what they are entitled to do.... if pride doesnt want cops there fine it is their choice. if the cops dont want to suppoet thats well within their rights too.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
9,833
1,612
113
The city should definitely pull the funding for Pride and the parade should be boycotted by gays and straights who disagree with caving in to BLM's non-inclusive demands.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
23,939
3,701
113
These councillors are inflaming Pride's problem with Black Lives Matter because they're against both groups. They never supported Pride to begin with.
No, the City is simply being dad and saying, "everyone needs to get along" because frankly, Pride Toronto and BLM are acting like a bunch of children.

And I disagree that the City has not supported Pride. They allow it to happen, they support it financially to the tune of $260,000 tax payer dollars every year, and they throw in piles of freebies like garbage clean up, security, permitting, etc. etc. If that isn't support, I don't know what is.

Some might argue that $260,000.00 in tax money a year for an exclusionary group is money better spent elsewhere. Like cleaning parks, or camp programs for kids, or a new water main, or any number of things. But instead, the City says, nope, we want to foster an environment of inclusion and tolerance and everyone having a good time.

If that isn't support, I don't know what is.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,887
239
63
No, the City is simply being dad and saying, "everyone needs to get along" because frankly, Pride Toronto and BLM are acting like a bunch of children.

And I disagree that the City has not supported Pride. They allow it to happen, they support it financially to the tune of $260,000 tax payer dollars every year, and they throw in piles of freebies like garbage clean up, security, permitting, etc. etc. If that isn't support, I don't know what is.

Some might argue that $260,000.00 in tax money a year for an exclusionary group is money better spent elsewhere. Like cleaning parks, or camp programs for kids, or a new water main, or any number of things. But instead, the City says, nope, we want to foster an environment of inclusion and tolerance and everyone having a good time.

If that isn't support, I don't know what is.
To be fair if it cost the city 260K, lots of money comes into the city and businesses during Pride. I think it is in the order of millions.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,814
3,468
113
These councillors are inflaming Pride's problem with Black Lives Matter because they're against both groups. They never supported Pride to begin with.
Your kidding right? The event now covers ten days. Ford was vilified by just about every councillor when he wouldn't attend.

They support it via grants, access to city services and property. They raise the flag at City Hall.

What the hell else do they have to do to show support?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,814
3,468
113
To be fair if it cost the city 260K, lots of money comes into the city and businesses during Pride. I think it is in the order of millions.
Absolutely. It's a good deal all around. Which is why BLM hijacking it and planning to change the tone to one of combativeness is wrong.

What I find interesting is why didn't they try this with Caribana. I get the feeling they had their asses handed to them and we're shown the door. They then decided to use Pride instead.

Pride needs to grow a pair. And tell these idiots they are not going to ruin the Name of Pride for their agenda.
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,685
1,199
113
Toronto
No, the City is simply being dad and saying, "everyone needs to get along" because frankly, Pride Toronto and BLM are acting like a bunch of children.

And I disagree that the City has not supported Pride. They allow it to happen, they support it financially to the tune of $260,000 tax payer dollars every year, and they throw in piles of freebies like garbage clean up, security, permitting, etc. etc. If that isn't support, I don't know what is.

Some might argue that $260,000.00 in tax money a year for an exclusionary group is money better spent elsewhere. Like cleaning parks, or camp programs for kids, or a new water main, or any number of things. But instead, the City says, nope, we want to foster an environment of inclusion and tolerance and everyone having a good time.

If that isn't support, I don't know what is.
I never said the City didn't support Pride, I'm talking about a handful of councillors who've always wanted it gone.
 
Toronto Escorts