Also, the two religions I admire the most do not require penis chopping.You were doing fine up to this point. Baptism is the door, no provisional too it.
Also, the two religions I admire the most do not require penis chopping.You were doing fine up to this point. Baptism is the door, no provisional too it.
Negative, if you are baptised as an infant, which is what the post was about. The Christian churches, at least the ones I am familiar with, holds that you must know about the religion before you can join, hence the religious education and Confirmation.You were doing fine up to this point. Baptism is the door, no provisional too it.
Well it is true that you need to be educated in the faith. But Baptism is once for all.Negative, if you are baptised as an infant, which is what the post was about. The Christian churches, at least the ones I am familiar with, holds that you must know about the religion before you can join, hence the religious education and Confirmation.
This is one area where the Christian Churches have it right.
The education includes that a baptized infant does not become a member of the Christian community before he/she confirmed the baptism at a later age.Well it is true that you need to be educated in the faith. But Baptism is once for all.
What you are stating was generally the way it was phrased particularly in the Anglican and State Lutheran traditions about fifty years ago - for instance you could never receive the Eucharist until after you had been confirmed. Since that time in both traditions it has been acknowledged that what this did was diminish the importance of Baptism and make it into a two phase process which both traditions acknowledge was not justifiable either historically or theologically.The education includes that a baptized infant does not become a member of the Christian community before he/she confirmed the baptism at a later age.
Where did you get your Christian education? I remember you have many times questioned the religious education by the Danish Lutheran Church.
The real reasons for the Church dogmas in this area are of course economic. It is good marketing practise to allow and encourage everybody to become Christian without a genetic requirement. That is why there are more Christians than Jesus.What you are stating was generally the way it was phrased particularly in the Anglican and State Lutheran traditions about fifty years ago - for instance you could never receive the Eucharist until after you had been confirmed. Since that time in both traditions it has been acknowledged that what this did was diminish the importance of Baptism and make it into a two phase process which both traditions acknowledge was not justifiable either historically or theologically.
The Roman Catholic Church is still pretty much in that two phase tradition (First Communion and all that), interestingly the Eastern Churches never adopted it at all.
No I am not. You are.You are completely wrong about this. Nobody is born a Cristian. The Christian religion has nothing to do with genetics.
Other religions may be different. I do not know, but maybe you are born Jewish if your mother is Jewish. I don't know. Possibly you are born Buddhist if you are reincarnated.
Splitting hairs.You are completely wrong about this. Nobody is born a Cristian.....
Then he converted to Islam,...and the rest is history.Splitting hairs.
In this case the guy was born to a Christian family and was raised in a Christian household where they celebrated Christian holidays.
In other words subjective, depending on which specific denominations and cultures within the same denominations.No, I am not. You are.
Thanks, nice to see you posting something like this.Here is precisely what is often said (including by me) is not often done enough in the Muslim Community. Hence I want to loudly point out this article with photographs of Muslim women standing hand-in-hand on Westminster Bridge in a show of solidarity with those killed and injured in Wednesday's terror attack.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-stand-solidarity-London-terror-victims.html
Great to see,...maybe the tide will turn.Here is precisely what is often said (including by me) is not often done enough in the Muslim Community. Hence I want to loudly point out this article with photographs of Muslim women standing hand-in-hand on Westminster Bridge in a show of solidarity with those killed and injured in Wednesday's terror attack.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-stand-solidarity-London-terror-victims.html
Its a thing of beauty when good people stand up for what is right. Its not right that these people have to do this, but its the world we live in.Here is precisely what is often said (including by me) is not often done enough in the Muslim Community. Hence I want to loudly point out this article with photographs of Muslim women standing hand-in-hand on Westminster Bridge in a show of solidarity with those killed and injured in Wednesday's terror attack.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-stand-solidarity-London-terror-victims.html
Yep,...good on him,...there are many more "good",... what ever the hell that means,...and intelligent Muslims around.Muddassar Ahmed started a fund for the victims Muslims United for London they raised £18,000 in one day and £30,000 in three. Three quarters of the donations came from Muslims. As he said to ITV "I did it because sometimes condemnation is not enough. Because actions speak louder than words."
Bravo for Mr. Ahmed!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...se-30k-Westminster-terror-attack-victims.html
No, there is no denying that Christianity is not based upon genetics. Period.You are not born a Christian.In other words subjective, depending on which specific denominations and cultures within the same denominations.