Toronto Escorts

The new darling of the alt-right advocates pederasty

Previous Thread Next Thread
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,846
113
Poor Milo the troll, now CPAC is going to infringe on his free speech and prevent him from speaking.
 
bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
We always knew that Milo was a sicko. The right wing loonies love the guy and they will do all they can to defend him.
 
B

Baller Time

I can't remembe..Romnesla
Dec 13, 2011
2,111
1
38
None of this means shit, because the current administration is compromised by Russian FSB at the direction of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (3 names for Aardy)
 
C

Conway_Stewart

Banned
May 8, 2010
1,017
1
0
Kathleen said:
Its impossible to defend the idea of a 13yr old boy with an older male. Both that, and the joke of learning oral sex from a priest was neither funny or comfortable to me.

I know his sense of humor can rival a comedy central roast, but even I have my limits. That was a turn off.
Click to expand...
I agree. A joke is only funny if there is some element of truth to it. I'm not sure what element of truth Milos thought he was touching upon...It sounds like he has some confused thoughts and feelings around his own sexual abuse by a Catholic priest. If that's the case I feel kinda bad for the guy...but his views are fucked up nonetheless.
 
B

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,814
3,468
113
bver_hunter said:
We always knew that Milo was a sicko. The right wing loonies love the guy and they will do all they can to defend him.
Click to expand...
You do realize it was right wing commentators who orchestrated this don't you? A good thing mind to take him down in light of this. But please this isn't a right left thing. No one advocates for a an idiot like him beyond certain free speech rights.
 
S

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
Milo is many things - foremost provocative troll - but idiot is not one of them. He's highly intelligent, a brilliant writer, debater, lecturer, and speaker. He can't be judged based on one misstep. He's an anti-dote to pervasive PC culture run amok, and an informed challenger on important issues of sexuality, race, gender, and free speech.
 
F

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Smallcock said:
Milo is many things - foremost provocative troll - but idiot is not one of them. He's highly intelligent, a brilliant writer, debater, lecturer, and speaker. He can't be judged based on one misstep. He's an anti-dote to pervasive PC culture run amok, and an informed challenger on important issues of sexuality, race, gender, and free speech.
Click to expand...
No one is surprised that you admire this pedophile.
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,846
113
Smallcock said:
Milo is many things - foremost provocative troll - but idiot is not one of them. He's highly intelligent, a brilliant writer, debater, lecturer, and speaker. He can't be judged based on one misstep. He's an anti-dote to pervasive PC culture run amok, and an informed challenger on important issues of sexuality, race, gender, and free speech.
Click to expand...
Too late, he's done.
He'll be too toxic for the alt-right to even use now.
 
C

Conway_Stewart

Banned
May 8, 2010
1,017
1
0
Smallcock said:
Milo is many things - foremost provocative troll - but idiot is not one of them. He's highly intelligent, a brilliant writer, debater, lecturer, and speaker. He can't be judged based on one misstep. He's an anti-dote to pervasive PC culture run amok, and an informed challenger on important issues of sexuality, race, gender, and free speech.
Click to expand...
Frankfooter said:
Too late, he's done.
He'll be too toxic for the alt-right to even use now.
Click to expand...
Smallcock can rest easy...There will be some new buffoon to take his place for the Alt Right soon enough. There are plenty of them out there.
 
C

Conway_Stewart

Banned
May 8, 2010
1,017
1
0
Kathleen said:
I agree with you. I've enjoyed watching many of his lectures and speeches. It was an unfortunate situation, and he should have much better worded such a sensitive topic.

Was he defending pedophilia?
Certainly not. In the video, he clearly points out that a pedophile would reference an adult with an underage child. When that was touched on Milo was absolutely opposed to the notion.

The flaw words he used were suggesting a boy and a man. That is up for such interpretation. All he has to say was there is nothing wrong with a 14 yr old dating an older man of 18yrs.
Click to expand...






For the record, he refers to relationships between 13-year-olds and 25 or 28-year-olds:
He said in footage broadcast online that he defines paedophiles as people who are sexually attracted to children who have yet to hit puberty. He adds that he believes some teenagers under the age of 16 are able to consent to sexual activity.

At one point he refers to the possibility of relationships between 13-year-olds and 25 or 28-years-olds, claiming “these things do happen, perfectly consensually”.
Click to expand...
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.indep...hile-comments-a7592416.html?amp?client=safari


His comments reflect far more than "flawed words"; they reflect a fundamental lack of understanding of child development, power imbalance, and what actually constitutes consent.

Moreover, these comments are not out of character for Milos in any way. He is well known for his bullying disdain for the needs and rights of others...His nasty shit has finally caught up to him and was crystallized in his comments about pedophilia. The guy is a nasty piece of work and richly deserves everything he has been getting over the past 2 days.





Will his fans look past this? I'd imagine so, as I will.
Click to expand...
Of course.
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,846
113
Kathleen said:
I agree with you. I've enjoyed watching many of his lectures and speeches. It was an unfortunate situation, and he should have much better worded such a sensitive topic.

Was he defending pedophilia?
Certainly not. In the video, he clearly points out that a pedophile would reference an adult with an underage child. When that was touched on Milo was absolutely opposed to the notion.

The flaw words he used were suggesting a boy and a man. That is up for such interpretation. All he has to say was there is nothing wrong with a 14 yr old dating an older man of 18yrs.

The topic is still highly creepy for me, but that only because I find discomfort in age gaps when one party is very young.

But Milo has not committed a crime. Its not like he bragged about dating teen boys. Most who are all over this story in disgust, already hated him. He took on a delicate topic, and carelessly used general wording that could make people rightfully uneasy.

Will his fans look past this? I'd imagine so, as I will.

While many are calling for his end, and saying this was all terrible remember, he didn't commit a crime. Roman Polanski was actually charged for drugging, and sexually assaulting a 13yr old and Hollywood honors him with an award. Meryl Streep spoke on his behalf, and participated in a standing ovation.

So when unable to forgive someone, is it really what was said, or just the fact he was hated before this even happened?
Click to expand...
It always comes back to Polanski, eh?
As his victim said:
In October 2015, after another request for extradition, a judge in Poland refused the request.[17] Geimer herself supported the Polish decision, adding, "He said he did it, he pled guilty, he went to jail. I don't know what people want from him."[18]
Click to expand...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski

Polanski admitted the crime and went to prison, though fled before full sentencing. Co-incidentally, with someone the same age that Milo says is acceptable to have sex with.

The only real question around Polanski should be whether he served enough time for his crime and whether once he admitted and plead guilty and did his time (which he probably should still do) then whether or not he can be rehabilitated or not. His relationship with Nastassja Kinski, who was just about at the age of consent should make one wonder. Though his later marriage to Emmanuelle Seigner has a more Trump like age difference and format. Probably it would be interesting to compare Polanski and Trump's fascination with girls around the age of consent, such as Trump's Miss Universe tendency to walk into pre-age of consent contestants dressing rooms.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...eepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-w444634

And Trump's history of comments are also questionable.
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/...young-girls-10-year-old-teens-sexual-comments

And don't forget the strange and probably dubious claims that Trump himself raped a 13 year old girl, though the charges were dropped and the woman disappeared.
There are still questions about Trump's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

So yes, Polanski, despite being a great director, is not someone who should be applauded, if you ask me. But then neither should Trump for that matter.

Milo?
I think the troll has had his 15 minutes and we should move on.
 
B

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,814
3,468
113
Frankfooter said:
It always comes back to Polanski, eh?
As his victim said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski

Polanski admitted the crime and went to prison, though fled before full sentencing. Co-incidentally, with someone the same age that Milo says is acceptable to have sex with.

The only real question around Polanski should be whether he served enough time for his crime and whether once he admitted and plead guilty and did his time (which he probably should still do) then whether or not he can be rehabilitated or not. His relationship with Nastassja Kinski, who was just about at the age of consent should make one wonder. Though his later marriage to Emmanuelle Seigner has a more Trump like age difference and format. Probably it would be interesting to compare Polanski and Trump's fascination with girls around the age of consent, such as Trump's Miss Universe tendency to walk into pre-age of consent contestants dressing rooms.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...eepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-w444634

And Trump's history of comments are also questionable.
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/...young-girls-10-year-old-teens-sexual-comments

And don't forget the strange and probably dubious claims that Trump himself raped a 13 year old girl, though the charges were dropped and the woman disappeared.
There are still questions about Trump's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

So yes, Polanski, despite being a great director, is not someone who should be applauded, if you ask me. But then neither should Trump for that matter.

Milo?
I think the troll has had his 15 minutes and we should move on.
Click to expand...
So again.....the Vox story clearly states the story about Trump and the 13 year old consists of a supposed victim never identified, two supposed cooberaters also never identified. An avowed Never Trump person, a former reality wannabe who shopped the story for a year with no bites due to absolutely no evidence.

This is pure garbage. There is nothing to it other than a cheap accusation. Nothing. Not a shred of evidence. Why do you keep posting fake news? That's what this is.
 
C

Conway_Stewart

Banned
May 8, 2010
1,017
1
0
Kathleen said:
I don't approve of what he said and I certainly don't agree with it, but this is a complex issue and there is a great deal of hypocrisy among some of his critics.
Click to expand...
What is with the ad hominem attacks on Milos' critics? What does that have to do with his support of child sexual abuse? Whether or not his critics are of pristine character does not excuse his remarks...It's just an attempt to discredit the messenger by those who don't like the message.




I fully agree with you on the remarks Milo does make. But doing anything without a script, you don't have time to think things through. A haste comment, used with a comment like the priest and BJ reference, was nothing more than shock. He's trying to sell a book, and got reckless.
Click to expand...
The fact that his remarks are unscripted shows us that these are indeed his true thoughts. He has not had time to parse and spin doctor them; he is expressing his genuine beliefs and ideas which are appalling.







I remember when George Takei (Mr Sulu) joked on Howard Stern about having a much older camp counselor 'pop his cherry' when he was only 13 or 14. I found the conversation sick, but still love those old star trek episodes.
Click to expand...
George Takei was the worst and most boring character on Star Trek. He should have been one of the Red Shirted crew members who got bumped off when he beamed down to a planet with Capt Kirk and Mr Spock.
 
mandrill

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,646
69,642
113
Frankfooter said:
It always comes back to Polanski, eh?
As his victim said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski

Polanski admitted the crime and went to prison, though fled before full sentencing. Co-incidentally, with someone the same age that Milo says is acceptable to have sex with.

The only real question around Polanski should be whether he served enough time for his crime and whether once he admitted and plead guilty and did his time (which he probably should still do) then whether or not he can be rehabilitated or not. His relationship with Nastassja Kinski, who was just about at the age of consent should make one wonder. Though his later marriage to Emmanuelle Seigner has a more Trump like age difference and format. Probably it would be interesting to compare Polanski and Trump's fascination with girls around the age of consent, such as Trump's Miss Universe tendency to walk into pre-age of consent contestants dressing rooms.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...eepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-w444634

And Trump's history of comments are also questionable.
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/...young-girls-10-year-old-teens-sexual-comments

And don't forget the strange and probably dubious claims that Trump himself raped a 13 year old girl, though the charges were dropped and the woman disappeared.
There are still questions about Trump's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

So yes, Polanski, despite being a great director, is not someone who should be applauded, if you ask me. But then neither should Trump for that matter.

Milo?
I think the troll has had his 15 minutes and we should move on.
Click to expand...
Polanski actually had a plea bargain worked out and the judge refused to bite - which caused Polanski to flee. There were enough signs of state and judicial misconduct that Switzerland refused to extradite Polanski, despite having an extradition treaty with the USA.
 
B

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Smallcock said:
... He's an anti-dote to pervasive PC culture run amok, and an informed challenger on important issues of sexuality, race, gender, and free speech.
Click to expand...
He's is (was?) the pet of the alt-right community to insulate them from accusations of racism and homophobia. He should have just stuck to being a comedian.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom