Toronto Escorts

Unverified report alleging Trump is blackmailed by Putin - text

S

**Sophie**

Russian hackers went to all the trouble of getting Trump elected in order to expose his sex fetishes. Makes sense if you are a liberal lol
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,702
3,400
113
Resorting to fake news now? Really oagre are you that desperate for validation now.

Cripes even they say it's Unconfirmed, unsubstantiated an rife with errors.

And it's Buzzfeed for cripes sakes.

Why not also make 487 dollars a day off the internet while you're at it.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
69,881
68,400
113
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html

Well, everyone else is talking about it, Butler. I thought I'd get you up to speed. And we don't know if it's "fake news", in the Breitbart sense of the word. Right now, it's just "unverified". So no bets, but we'll see what happens. Obama, Trump and McCain have all been briefed on the allegations.

I also included the CNN discussion. But of course, I realize you guys don't take CNN seriously either.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
69,881
68,400
113
CNN)Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.
The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The allegations came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative, whose past work US intelligence officials consider credible. The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.
The classified briefings last week were presented by four of the senior-most US intelligence chiefs -- Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.

One reason the nation's intelligence chiefs took the extraordinary step of including the synopsis in the briefing documents was to make the President-elect aware that such allegations involving him are circulating among intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress and other government officials in Washington, multiple sources tell CNN.
These senior intelligence officials also included the synopsis to demonstrate that Russia had compiled information potentially harmful to both political parties, but only released information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Democrats. This synopsis was not an official part of the report from the intelligence community case about Russian hacks, but some officials said it augmented the evidence that Moscow intended to harm Clinton's candidacy and help Trump's, several officials with knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.
The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials.
Sources tell CNN that these same allegations about communications between the Trump campaign and the Russians, mentioned in classified briefings for congressional leaders last year, prompted then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid to send a letter to FBI Director Comey in October, in which he wrote, "It has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government -- a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States."
CNN has confirmed that the synopsis was included in the documents that were presented to Mr. Trump but cannot confirm if it was discussed in his meeting with the intelligence chiefs.
The Trump transition team declined repeated requests for comment.
CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats. At this point, CNN is not reporting on details of the memos, as it has not independently corroborated the specific allegations. But, in preparing this story, CNN has spoken to multiple high ranking intelligence, administration, congressional and law enforcement officials, as well as foreign officials and others in the private sector with direct knowledge of the memos.
Some of the memos were circulating as far back as last summer. What has changed since then is that US intelligence agencies have now checked out the former British intelligence operative and his vast network throughout Europe and find him and his sources to be credible enough to include some of the information in the presentations to the President and President-elect a few days ago.
On the same day that the President-elect was briefed by the intelligence community, the top four Congressional leaders, and chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees -- the so-called "Gang of Eight" -- were also provided a summary of the memos regarding Mr. Trump, according to law enforcement, intelligence and administration sources.
The two-page summary was written without the detailed specifics and information about sources and methods included in the memos by the former British intelligence official. That said, the synopsis was considered so sensitive it was not included in the classified report about Russian hacking that was more widely distributed, but rather in an annex only shared at the most senior levels of the government: President Obama, the President-elect, and the eight Congressional leaders.
CNN has also learned that on December 9, Senator John McCain gave a full copy of the memos -- dated from June through December, 2016 -- to FBI Director James Comey. McCain became aware of the memos from a former British diplomat who had been posted in Moscow. But the FBI had already been given a set of the memos compiled up to August 2016, when the former MI6 agent presented them to an FBI official in Rome, according to national security officials.
The raw memos on which the synopsis is based were prepared by the former MI6 agent, who was posted in Russia in the 1990s and now runs a private intelligence gathering firm. His investigations related to Mr. Trump were initially funded by groups and donors supporting Republican opponents of Mr. Trump during the GOP primaries, multiple sources confirmed to CNN. Those sources also said that once Mr. Trump became the nominee, further investigation was funded by groups and donors supporting Hillary Clinton.
Spokespeople for the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment. Officials who spoke to CNN declined to do so on the record given the classified nature of the material.
Some of the allegations were first reported publicly in Mother Jones one week before the election.
One high level administration official told CNN, "I have a sense the outgoing administration and intelligence community is setting down the pieces so this must be investigated seriously and run down. I think [the] concern was to be sure that whatever information was out there is put into the system so it is evaluated as it should be and acted upon as necessary."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html
 
S

**Sophie**

Resorting to fake news now? Really oagre are you that desperate for validation now.
Democraps will fight President-elect all the way. Not with votes tho, they will make up fake news and have CNN/NYT spread it as fact. Desperate times calls for desperate measures.

http://latest.com/2017/01/fake-news-trump-calls-report-of-russian-blackmail-political-witch-hunt/
Donald Trump's lawyer says a salacious intelligence dossier accusing the president-elect of receiving intelligence on his political rivals and engaging in "sexual perversion" including hiring prostitutes to perform "golden showers" in his presence is nothing more than "fake news."
"Somebody is having a lot of fun at your expense," Michael Cohen special counsel to Trump, laughingly told Mic in a phone interview Tuesday night.
"It's so ridiculous on so many levels. Clearly the person who created this did so from their imagination or did so hoping that the liberal media would run with this fake story for whatever rationale they might have."
Cohen issued the emphatic blanket denial after CNN reported the Russian government is claiming to have gathered "compromising personal and financial information" about the incoming president.
"It's absolutely silly," Cohen said of the dossier.
"At some point in time, this fake news nonsense needs to stop. We are talking about the president-elect of the United States of America, and if we want to portray an image of strength and intelligence throughout the world, we need to start acting intelligent," he said.

Cohen, one of Trump's closest longtime associates and a diehard defender of his boss, also scoffed at a reference in the same document that claimed he himself "allegedly met with NGO officials who are part of the Kremlin for some hacking scheme."
The Trump loyalist said he was in Los Angeles celebrating his 50th birthday with his wife and son during the late summer timeframe when the document claimed he was supposedly hobnobbing with the Russians at a secret meeting overseas.
"I've never been to Prague," Cohen told Mic, later going on to make the same assertion in a tweet accompanied by a photo of a passport:
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,702
3,400
113
Sometimes I take CNN seriously. I sure as hell don't watch fox. Usually though I pretty much know just looking at the latest panel what they are going to say, how they are going to say it and who will disagree with who.

My question is this? Everyone is talking about fake news put out by them. But this one, without it seems good verification is being taken seriously.

First they(if it was them) release the truth about Hillary. Probably because it was better then any lie they could have told. But lots of fake news lies were floating about her as well I didn't lend any credence too.

And above all else the narrative is undermining confidence in democracy. Surely the possibility this is just another attack has to come up? Don't get me wrong, if there is truth here, and quite frankly so far it's vague allegations with absolutely no meat released at all, then they need to be investigated.

Imagine if we end up with President Pence after all. Be careful what you wish for.......
 
S

**Sophie**

Sometimes I take CNN seriously. I sure as hell don't watch fox. Usually though I pretty much know just looking at the latest panel what they are going to say, how they are going to say it and who will disagree with who.

My question is this? Everyone is talking about fake news put out by them. But this one, without it seems good verification is being taken seriously.

First they(if it was them) release the truth about Hillary. Probably because it was better then any lie they could have told. But lots of fake news lies were floating about her as well I didn't lend any credence too.

And above all else the narrative is undermining confidence in democracy. Surely the possibility this is just another attack has to come up? Don't get me wrong, if there is truth here, and quite frankly so far it's vague allegations with absolutely no meat released at all, then they need to be investigated.

Imagine if we end up with President Pence after all. Be careful what you wish for.......
No government seal on this fake intel report, nothing, just a couple of poorly scanned pieces of paper lol. These guys have more stories than Walt Disney.

Sorry Butler, this doozy needs to be filed under the folder titled: PROJECT BULLSHIT LOL
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
CNN)Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.
The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The allegations came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative, whose past work US intelligence officials consider credible. The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.
The classified briefings last week were presented by four of the senior-most US intelligence chiefs -- Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.

One reason the nation's intelligence chiefs took the extraordinary step of including the synopsis in the briefing documents was to make the President-elect aware that such allegations involving him are circulating among intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress and other government officials in Washington, multiple sources tell CNN.
These senior intelligence officials also included the synopsis to demonstrate that Russia had compiled information potentially harmful to both political parties, but only released information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Democrats. This synopsis was not an official part of the report from the intelligence community case about Russian hacks, but some officials said it augmented the evidence that Moscow intended to harm Clinton's candidacy and help Trump's, several officials with knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.
The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials.
Sources tell CNN that these same allegations about communications between the Trump campaign and the Russians, mentioned in classified briefings for congressional leaders last year, prompted then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid to send a letter to FBI Director Comey in October, in which he wrote, "It has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government -- a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States."
CNN has confirmed that the synopsis was included in the documents that were presented to Mr. Trump but cannot confirm if it was discussed in his meeting with the intelligence chiefs.
The Trump transition team declined repeated requests for comment.
CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats. At this point, CNN is not reporting on details of the memos, as it has not independently corroborated the specific allegations. But, in preparing this story, CNN has spoken to multiple high ranking intelligence, administration, congressional and law enforcement officials, as well as foreign officials and others in the private sector with direct knowledge of the memos.
Some of the memos were circulating as far back as last summer. What has changed since then is that US intelligence agencies have now checked out the former British intelligence operative and his vast network throughout Europe and find him and his sources to be credible enough to include some of the information in the presentations to the President and President-elect a few days ago.
On the same day that the President-elect was briefed by the intelligence community, the top four Congressional leaders, and chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees -- the so-called "Gang of Eight" -- were also provided a summary of the memos regarding Mr. Trump, according to law enforcement, intelligence and administration sources.
The two-page summary was written without the detailed specifics and information about sources and methods included in the memos by the former British intelligence official. That said, the synopsis was considered so sensitive it was not included in the classified report about Russian hacking that was more widely distributed, but rather in an annex only shared at the most senior levels of the government: President Obama, the President-elect, and the eight Congressional leaders.
CNN has also learned that on December 9, Senator John McCain gave a full copy of the memos -- dated from June through December, 2016 -- to FBI Director James Comey. McCain became aware of the memos from a former British diplomat who had been posted in Moscow. But the FBI had already been given a set of the memos compiled up to August 2016, when the former MI6 agent presented them to an FBI official in Rome, according to national security officials.
The raw memos on which the synopsis is based were prepared by the former MI6 agent, who was posted in Russia in the 1990s and now runs a private intelligence gathering firm. His investigations related to Mr. Trump were initially funded by groups and donors supporting Republican opponents of Mr. Trump during the GOP primaries, multiple sources confirmed to CNN. Those sources also said that once Mr. Trump became the nominee, further investigation was funded by groups and donors supporting Hillary Clinton.
Spokespeople for the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment. Officials who spoke to CNN declined to do so on the record given the classified nature of the material.
Some of the allegations were first reported publicly in Mother Jones one week before the election.
One high level administration official told CNN, "I have a sense the outgoing administration and intelligence community is setting down the pieces so this must be investigated seriously and run down. I think [the] concern was to be sure that whatever information was out there is put into the system so it is evaluated as it should be and acted upon as necessary."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html
Boom.

Now we know why they worked so hard to elect him. They think they own him.

The best thing to do now is release the damaging information to the public to neutralize its value to the Russians. Trump will have to suffer the consequences of his immoral behavior but at least he won't be in the thrall of a foreign dictator.
 
S

**Sophie**

Because of this fake story, #fakefeed is now trending on twitter. Lots of information on how this little story was twisted together.
 
S

**Sophie**

CNN is a reliable source.

I see you are panicking...
CNN=FAKE NEWS now trending on Twitter lol. Not panicking at all, it's actually quite funny and the truth will be out shortly; embarrassing you yet again for falling for such a dumb story lol. However, I do not like when a highly watched news site such as CNN peddles fake stories posing as real ones, yes that bothers me. I don't like lies regardless of who it's against. And I will be first in line to bring the truth out everytime I see a fake story. It's a thankless job, but someone has to do it :)
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,702
3,400
113
CNN is a reliable source.

I see you are panicking...
At this point it's in the realm that Obama is a secret Muslim and not born in the USA. CNN reported on those little tidbits as well.

All I see is hearsay. And no way does a good news source call it anything but pure speculation at this point with no cooberation.

I'm getting the feeling they showed this fake news item as an example of what people will produce against anyone so Trump understands the threat better. Not as something he actually has to be worried about.

And it's been taken out of context.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
At this point it's in the realm that Obama is a secret Muslim and not born in the USA.
Wrong.

"Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN."
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Other stories are going further. They say that Trump was in regular contact with Russian intelligence. They say that the Russians tried to give him money but he refused. However they say he agreed to receive regular intelligence materials from Russia.

If this is true he should be charged with treason, and if convicted he should face the death penalty.
 

asterwald

Active member
Dec 11, 2010
2,585
0
36
Other stories are going further. They say that Trump was in regular contact with Russian intelligence. They say that the Russians tried to give him money but he refused. However they say he agreed to receive regular intelligence materials from Russia.

If this is true he should be charged with treason, and if convicted he should face the death penalty.
LOL. He's a guy who builds hotels. He isnt even that rich. Why would Russia care?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
LOL. He's a guy who builds hotels. He isnt even that rich. Why would Russia care?
He ran for President five years ago. Russia has been supporting him since then. According to this report, grooming him.

Until this year they may just have thought that his birther conspiracy schtick was useful to them, delegitimizing the US government in the eyes of people like you. Then when he got a real shot at winning they went all in to support him.

I bet several people at GRU HQ in Moscow have gotten well earned promotions in the last couple weeks.
 
Toronto Escorts