Rattle:
You didn't remember a review, you remembered part of a review that suited you. If you can't get your facts straight, please do everybody a favor, keep them to yourself.
You forgot to mention, in Lucy's case, all was resolved to the customer's satisfaction, so as it was ot the latest "asian" case.
That's what's important: Tracey handle problems and ensure customers are satisfied, if not with the girl they were, with somebody else.
How could you explain a guy who's so "pissed" he refuse a free girl offered by management because he fell he should at least pay half of the cost? That guy must have been really pissed to accept a new girl and insist on paying half the price!! (Lucy's case)
Girls who work at agencies (or indies) are not always the top of the line when it comes to morality. Most are honest, some are bordeline at stretching the limit and some are plain ripping customers off. Tracey can hardly rely on their "résumé" to make a choice and references are probably scarse or inexistant so, she have to rely on what the girl say, on what she can learn by herself and on instincts. That's not fool-proof. As I said, what's important is correction are made. And even if the girl is totally honest, shit does happen: when you get a bad news about somebody you care, all you think is to get close to them. The rest can be settled after. (again, Lucy's)
No, I'm not a shill. I've never met Tracey or any of her girls. I have no business relationship with her. I simply hate when somebody is being attacked without valid motive, that's it. Note I didn't take Tracey's defense on the MSOG's question!