Select Company Escorts
Toronto Escorts

Ontario Faces An Electricity Shortage, And Doug Ford Is Making It Worse

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
10/17/2018 11:12 EDT Updated 10/17/2018 11:14 EDT

Ontario Faces An Electricity Shortage, And Doug Ford Is Making It Worse

Carbon emissions from electricity generation are set to start rising again.

By Daniel Tencer

THE CANADIAN PRESS/COLIN PERKEL

Ontario will face electricity shortages in the coming years, as the loss of supply from a planned shutdown of a major nuclear power plant is made worse by the provincial government's cancellation of renewable energy projects.

In a recent forecast, the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) — the Crown corporation that runs the province's electric grid — predicted that, if nothing changes, Ontario will start seeing electricity shortages during peak summer periods starting in 2023 and continuing thereafter. The report also forecasts shortages during peak winter usage from 2025 to 2028.

The province will be short about 1,400 megawatts of capacity by 2023. That's the equivalent of roughly half the output of Ontario's Pickering nuclear power plant, which serves 1.5 million people.

The IESO says the plant's shutdown, which will take places in stages from 2022 to 2024, is the principal reason for the looming shortage. The plant is coming to the end of its life cycle. Long-running refurbishments at other nuclear power plants will also limit the province's electricity supply.

But the cancellation of 758 renewable energy projects, which the government of Premier Doug Ford announced as one of its first moves, widens the gap even further. Ontario will forgo the production of some 443 megawatts of energy, according to earlier reports.

The government argues the projects were too expensive, and cancelling them will save taxpayers some $790 million. Industry insiders disputed that estimate, noting that the cancellations themselves could end up costing taxpayers money. They said the cancellations would mean job losses.

In an email to HuffPost Canada, the IESO stressed that there is time to address the problem.

"There is no immediate need to act to fill the gap now," a spokesperson wrote, adding that "the potential gap emerging in the next five years is proportionally very small."

The spokesperson said the best approach "is to wait until we have more certainty about the size of the capacity gap. There are enough lower cost resources that can be developed with a three year lead time to meet a 2023 resource gap."

Carbon emissions on the rise again

The shutdown of the Pickering plant, combined with fewer planned renewable energy sources in the mix, means that Ontario will rely more on natural gas plants to generate electricity in the coming years, the IESO report showed.

That means carbon emissions from electricity generation will begin to rise again in the coming years — though not to the high levels seen before the previous provincial Liberal government eliminated the use of coal-fired plants.

In its long-term forecast, the IESO sees carbon emissions from electricity rising from less than 3 megatonnes per year today, to more than 10 megatonnes by 2035. However, that is still far less than the 35 megatonnes recorded in 2005, before coal plants began to be phased out.

IESOCarbon emissions from electricity generation in Ontario will start rising in the coming years, as the province grows more reliant on natural gas-powered plants.

—With a file from The Canadian Press

https://m.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/10/17/ontario-electricity-shortage_a_23563784
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
10/17/2018 11:12 EDT Updated 10/17/2018 11:14 EDT

Ontario Faces An Electricity Shortage, And Doug Ford Is Making It Worse

Carbon emissions from electricity generation are set to start rising again.

By Daniel Tencer

THE CANADIAN PRESS/COLIN PERKEL

Ontario will face electricity shortages in the coming years, as the loss of supply from a planned shutdown of a major nuclear power plant is made worse by the provincial government's cancellation of renewable energy projects.

In a recent forecast, the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) — the Crown corporation that runs the province's electric grid — predicted that, if nothing changes, Ontario will start seeing electricity shortages during peak summer periods starting in 2023 and continuing thereafter. The report also forecasts shortages during peak winter usage from 2025 to 2028.

The province will be short about 1,400 megawatts of capacity by 2023. That's the equivalent of roughly half the output of Ontario's Pickering nuclear power plant, which serves 1.5 million people.

The IESO says the plant's shutdown, which will take places in stages from 2022 to 2024, is the principal reason for the looming shortage. The plant is coming to the end of its life cycle. Long-running refurbishments at other nuclear power plants will also limit the province's electricity supply.

But the cancellation of 758 renewable energy projects, which the government of Premier Doug Ford announced as one of its first moves, widens the gap even further. Ontario will forgo the production of some 443 megawatts of energy, according to earlier reports.

The government argues the projects were too expensive, and cancelling them will save taxpayers some $790 million. Industry insiders disputed that estimate, noting that the cancellations themselves could end up costing taxpayers money. They said the cancellations would mean job losses.

In an email to HuffPost Canada, the IESO stressed that there is time to address the problem.

"There is no immediate need to act to fill the gap now," a spokesperson wrote, adding that "the potential gap emerging in the next five years is proportionally very small."

The spokesperson said the best approach "is to wait until we have more certainty about the size of the capacity gap. There are enough lower cost resources that can be developed with a three year lead time to meet a 2023 resource gap."

Carbon emissions on the rise again

The shutdown of the Pickering plant, combined with fewer planned renewable energy sources in the mix, means that Ontario will rely more on natural gas plants to generate electricity in the coming years, the IESO report showed.

That means carbon emissions from electricity generation will begin to rise again in the coming years — though not to the high levels seen before the previous provincial Liberal government eliminated the use of coal-fired plants.

In its long-term forecast, the IESO sees carbon emissions from electricity rising from less than 3 megatonnes per year today, to more than 10 megatonnes by 2035. However, that is still far less than the 35 megatonnes recorded in 2005, before coal plants began to be phased out.

IESOCarbon emissions from electricity generation in Ontario will start rising in the coming years, as the province grows more reliant on natural gas-powered plants.

—With a file from The Canadian Press

https://m.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/10/17/ontario-electricity-shortage_a_23563784
Dumb DOFO in action. He remains clueless as hell!!
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
23,939
3,701
113
Buy it from Quebec.

Cheaper and easier than any other options.

Either that or build a new coal fired plant. No form of generating electricity is more economical and produces as much power as coal.
 

SaturnFan

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2009
973
266
63
Carbon emissions will increase as a result of the upcoming Pickering closure, but this means more natural gas generation which there is more than enough to offset less nuclear generation. The 2000MW gas fired Lennox plant in eastern Ontario is hardly used right now. I don’t believe there will be an energy shortage unless demand increases significantly.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Buy it from Quebec.

Cheaper and easier than any other options.

Either that or build a new coal fired plant. No form of generating electricity is more economical and produces as much power as coal.
Tell us it's still economical if you build that new coal plant to dump lower emissions into the air than natural gas, and only buy the coal from mines with fully-funded clean-up operations already in place, that will leave the landscape and groundwater in better shape than gas-wells.

I say 'better' and 'lower', because after all, shouldn't we always be aiming for better, when we build new? Why go to all that trouble and expense only to achieve 'as good as'?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,698
17,860
113
Buy it from Quebec.

Cheaper and easier than any other options.

Either that or build a new coal fired plant. No form of generating electricity is more economical and produces as much power as coal.
Coal is more expensive now than solar and even natural gas.
That's the worst option, coal should stay in the ground.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts