Toronto Escorts

$23 Billion Bill To "Fully Fund" Border Wall To Be Introduced This Week

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
$23 Billion Bill To "Fully Fund" Border Wall To Be Introduced This Week


Tue, 10/09/2018 - 20:10
Twitter Facebook Reddit Email Print
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy plans to introduce a bill this week that will fully fund President Trump's much-promised border wall, according to an exclusive report by Breitbart.



The "Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act" would allocate $23.4 billion on top of the $1.6 billion already spent in order to build the wall the rest of the way, as well as provide for a "variety of enforcement measures."

McCarthy said in a statement to Breitbart News that: "President Trump’s election was a wakeup call to Washington. The American people want us to build the wall and enforce the law. Maintaining strong borders is one of the basic responsibilities of any nation. For too long, America has failed in this responsibility."

On Monday, outgoing House Speaker Paul Ryan hinted that there would be a post-midterms border wall funding fight, saying: "We intend on having a full-fledged discussion on how to complete our mission to secure the border, and yes, we will have a fight about this."

"Given that this new bill comes from the Majority Leader, McCarthy, and this bill contains several other measures already passed by the House with high margins of success, its prospects for passage are promising," writes Breitbart's Matt Boyle.

The enforcement measures expected to be in this wall funding legislation include, among other legislation, Kate’s Law, an enforcement bill named for Kate Steinle, who was killed in sanctuary city San Francisco in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election. Kate’s Law passed the House 257-167 last year. Also included will be a bill the House has already passed targeting sanctuary cities, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, which passed the House last year 228-195. The Criminal Alien Gang Member Removal Act, which passed the House last year 233-175, will be in the bill, as will two House resolutions on immigration that passed the House this year: one upholding and honoring Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, the other admonishing illegal alien voting in a number of American cities. -Breitbart

The forthcoming bill will not address Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) cases - which will give Democrats significantly less ammunition to derail the effort.

McCarthy will travel on Wednesday to the US border with Mexico to meet with Border Patrol agents, where he will also receive a briefing from Border Patrol officials on operations and threat assessments.

While the bill will probably pass through the House with little trouble, the Senate should prove to be a bit more daunting - as Republicans only have a 51-49 majority, and would need 60 votes to clear a filibuster hurdle on a cloture vote - unless Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell changed the Senate rules - which he has been thus far hesitant to do amid enormous pressure.

But that’s where things get interesting, as Republicans could pick up as many as five or more extra Senate seats in the midterm elections depending on how a variety of races shake out–meaning they would be much closer to that 60-vote threshold making it easier to roll the necessary Democrats and get the votes required to clear the cloture hurdle of 60 votes and get a bill like this to the president’s desk so he can sign it. -Breitbart

That said, Republicans wouldn't have those key votes until January, 2019 - and that's assuming the Democrats' "blue wave" crashes on the rocks. "that means whatever the House passes in late 2018 for it to become law unless the Senate goes for it this year would need to be passed again in early 2019," writes Boyle.

Red wave?

With a variety of post-midterm threats levied by Democrats - including launching investigations and impeachment proceedings against both President Trump and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Republicans who want to see the wall go up will have an additional incentive to head to the polls.

A vote for a Republican is a vote for the wall, in other words, as the House GOP will need to hold its majority going into the next Congress to ensure that this border wall funding makes it to the president’s desk. If Democrats take the House on November 6, a newly reminted Speaker Nancy Pelosi most certainly would not support funding the wall along the border–which, in turn, makes the midterms a referendum on the wall because if Republicans hold the House and add seats in the Senate, they can get the votes necessary to get full wall funding to Trump’s desk in early 2019. -Breitbart

In short - if you want the wall, go out and vote on November 6.
PS Oagre is on ignore!!
 
Last edited:

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,854
70,068
113
Nice try. That was a barbed wire fence. It didn't costs anywhere near the ridiculous amount of $$$ the "Wall" is supposed to cost.

I need some help here. First of all, Mexico was supposed to pay for the Wall. And then America was going to pay for the Wall, but Mexico was going to pay America back with all sorts of special tariffs.

Now that Trump has signed a trade deal with Mexico that doesn't include all those tariffs, doesn't that mean that just America is going to pay for the Wall?

What's your tax bracket?..... How many $$ do you think you'll be paying for a chunk of concrete that stretches for hundreds of miles across the Arizona desert? Few hundred? Few thousand $? You KNOW that there'll be cost over-runs in any government project.

Maybe there'll be a special program so that the rah-rah Republican guys like you can "donate" a few extra thousand $ to get it build faster. Maybe they'll even put your name on it. You can go and take a selfie standing next to the plaque. Good times. OTB!
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
23,939
3,701
113
I want the Americans to build a northern wall along the Canadian border as well as the Mexican border.

And one right up the east coast and down the west coast .

Then they can put a lid right on top of it all.
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,069
0
0
Just imagine you had a neighbour who had one of those dogs that can jump really high - higher than a standard 6 foot fence. Then imagine the dog is perpetually jumping over your 6 foot fence to terrorize your own pets, to take a dump in your yard for good measure, and confronts you aggressively when you try to remove it. You've talked to your neighbour about the problem, and his response is a combination of denying that it's such a serious problem and claims that he can't control the dog, but he has no suggestions as to how to prevent the problem, and doesn't appear interested in discussing the issue any further.

You check with your by-law officer, but learn that there is no way to have the dog taken away from the neighbour.

So, assuming that the dog can't jump 8 feet, do you raise your fence to that height? Who should pay for the cost of doing so? If the neighbour refuses to pay, what would you think about that neighbour? If you were sharing the cost of a driveway plowing service with that neighbour, would you tell him that you won't be paying your share until the fence improvement was covered?
 

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
Just imagine you had a neighbour who had one of those dogs that can jump really high - higher than a standard 6 foot fence. Then imagine the dog is perpetually jumping over your 6 foot fence to terrorize your own pets, to take a dump in your yard for good measure, and confronts you aggressively when you try to remove it. You've talked to your neighbour about the problem, and his response is a combination of denying that it's such a serious problem and claims that he can't control the dog, but he has no suggestions as to how to prevent the problem, and doesn't appear interested in discussing the issue any further.

You check with your by-law officer, but learn that there is no way to have the dog taken away from the neighbour.

So, assuming that the dog can't jump 8 feet, do you raise your fence to that height? Who should pay for the cost of doing so? If the neighbour refuses to pay, what would you think about that neighbour? If you were sharing the cost of a driveway plowing service with that neighbour, would you tell him that you won't be paying your share until the fence improvement was covered?
No, clearly you would enter into a long-term economical agreement with said neighbour and completely ignore the 'dog' issue, because deep down you really know that your complaining was just hype and bluster, which is your typical MO.
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
BTW, what happened to the Mexicans paying for the wall?
Don't worry Trump is helping the GOP to win the midterm... Mexico will pay for the wall !!

GO TRUMP GO!!

PS OAGRE IS ON MY IGNORE LISTS!!
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
$23 Billion Bill To "Fully Fund" Border Wall To Be Introduced This Week


Tue, 10/09/2018 - 20:10
Twitter Facebook Reddit Email Print
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy plans to introduce a bill this week that will fully fund President Trump's much-promised border wall, according to an exclusive report by Breitbart.



The "Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act" would allocate $23.4 billion on top of the $1.6 billion already spent in order to build the wall the rest of the way, as well as provide for a "variety of enforcement measures."

McCarthy said in a statement to Breitbart News that: "President Trump’s election was a wakeup call to Washington. The American people want us to build the wall and enforce the law. Maintaining strong borders is one of the basic responsibilities of any nation. For too long, America has failed in this responsibility."

On Monday, outgoing House Speaker Paul Ryan hinted that there would be a post-midterms border wall funding fight, saying: "We intend on having a full-fledged discussion on how to complete our mission to secure the border, and yes, we will have a fight about this."

"Given that this new bill comes from the Majority Leader, McCarthy, and this bill contains several other measures already passed by the House with high margins of success, its prospects for passage are promising," writes Breitbart's Matt Boyle.

The enforcement measures expected to be in this wall funding legislation include, among other legislation, Kate’s Law, an enforcement bill named for Kate Steinle, who was killed in sanctuary city San Francisco in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election. Kate’s Law passed the House 257-167 last year. Also included will be a bill the House has already passed targeting sanctuary cities, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, which passed the House last year 228-195. The Criminal Alien Gang Member Removal Act, which passed the House last year 233-175, will be in the bill, as will two House resolutions on immigration that passed the House this year: one upholding and honoring Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, the other admonishing illegal alien voting in a number of American cities. -Breitbart

The forthcoming bill will not address Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) cases - which will give Democrats significantly less ammunition to derail the effort.

McCarthy will travel on Wednesday to the US border with Mexico to meet with Border Patrol agents, where he will also receive a briefing from Border Patrol officials on operations and threat assessments.

While the bill will probably pass through the House with little trouble, the Senate should prove to be a bit more daunting - as Republicans only have a 51-49 majority, and would need 60 votes to clear a filibuster hurdle on a cloture vote - unless Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell changed the Senate rules - which he has been thus far hesitant to do amid enormous pressure.

But that’s where things get interesting, as Republicans could pick up as many as five or more extra Senate seats in the midterm elections depending on how a variety of races shake out–meaning they would be much closer to that 60-vote threshold making it easier to roll the necessary Democrats and get the votes required to clear the cloture hurdle of 60 votes and get a bill like this to the president’s desk so he can sign it. -Breitbart

That said, Republicans wouldn't have those key votes until January, 2019 - and that's assuming the Democrats' "blue wave" crashes on the rocks. "that means whatever the House passes in late 2018 for it to become law unless the Senate goes for it this year would need to be passed again in early 2019," writes Boyle.

Red wave?

With a variety of post-midterm threats levied by Democrats - including launching investigations and impeachment proceedings against both President Trump and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Republicans who want to see the wall go up will have an additional incentive to head to the polls.

A vote for a Republican is a vote for the wall, in other words, as the House GOP will need to hold its majority going into the next Congress to ensure that this border wall funding makes it to the president’s desk. If Democrats take the House on November 6, a newly reminted Speaker Nancy Pelosi most certainly would not support funding the wall along the border–which, in turn, makes the midterms a referendum on the wall because if Republicans hold the House and add seats in the Senate, they can get the votes necessary to get full wall funding to Trump’s desk in early 2019. -Breitbart

In short - if you want the wall, go out and vote on November 6.
PS Oagre is on ignore!!
Trump and the GOP must be getting desperate in the face of losing the House. When things are going bad bring up the wall. Standard MO. Very funny.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
There is actually a net outflow of Mexicans. The wall may actually keep the Mexicans in the US. Great idea. Too funny.
You’ve obviously never walked across the US/Mexico boarder. When transiting South into Mexico there is no border control at all, you just walk in.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,495
5,681
113
Still waiting to see when Mexico is billed for the $23 Billion. That is if it is passed. Thought that it was all supposed to be taken care of on Day 1 of the Trumptard Presidency!!
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
You’ve obviously never walked across the US/Mexico boarder. When transiting South into Mexico there is no border control at all, you just walk in.
I have not but these days more Mexicans are walking out than in. Maybe Mexico will pay for the wall to keep them from coming back.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I have not but these days more Mexicans are walking out than in. Maybe Mexico will pay for the wall to keep them from coming back.
Mexico immigration ebs a flows with economic conditions. The source is now Central America through Mexico.
 
Toronto Escorts