Obsession Massage
Toronto Escorts

Sessions hits back at Trump: Won't be influenced by 'political considerations'

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
Sessions has shown Trump the finger..... Finally and good for him!!

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who has endured a rocky relationship with Donald Trump for months, has issued his strongest pushback yet against the president, saying in a statement Thursday that the Department of Justice "will not be improperly influenced by political considerations."

When asked whether he will "fire Sessions" in an interview that aired on Fox News Thursday morning, Trump took aim at his attorney general, with whom he has waged both open and low-level warfare since Sessions recused himself from the Russia probe early last year.

"I said 'What kind of a man is this?'" Trump said during the interview. The president also said Sessions failed to take control of the DOJ.

"The only reason I gave him the job -- I felt loyalty."

Sessions attended a scheduled early afternoon White House meeting with Trump and senior adviser Jared Kushner on prison reform.

An administration official confirms to ABC News that the issue of Sessions' job or the president's criticism of him on Fox News did not come up in the meeting. The official said it wasn't clear whether the president had even seen Sessions' statement before sitting down for the meeting.

A top Republican senator came to Sessions' defense Thursday afternoon.

“I think those of us who’ve worked with Jeff Sessions for the last 15 years or more know him to be an honorable man, somebody who’s dedicated not only to rule of law, but also to the Department of Justice," Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, said, according to his office.

"He’s a quintessential Boy Scout in that respect. And I know this is a difficult position for him to be in but I think it would be bad for the country, it would be bad for the president, it would be bad for the Department of Justice for him to be forced out under these circumstances. So I hope he stays the course and I hope cooler heads prevail,” Cornyn said, according to his office.

Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, responding specifically to a question about Trump saying he would not have nominated Sessions if he knew he would recuse himself from the Russia investigation, said, "I don’t think the president should have said something like that. Jeff’s a very fine fellow and that’s a comment that really I think we could have done without, he said.

"But you know, the president’s the president. He’s very open, he’s straightforward, he sometimes gets himself in trouble in being so straightforward," Hatch said.

Notably, another Republican, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, predicted Sessions would be out of his job in the near future, but added Trump should wait until after November's midterm elections.

In remarks to reporters confirmed by ABC, Graham said, "The president’s entitled to an attorney general he has faith in, somebody that’s qualified for the job, and I think there will come a time, sooner rather than later, where it will be time to have a new face and a fresh voice at the Department of Justice. Clearly, Attorney General Sessions doesn’t have the confidence of the president.”

Trump this week has taken several shots at the Justice Department under Sessions, who was one of Trump's earliest supporters during the 2016 campaign, even putting quotation marks around the word "Justice" in a tweet.

In the statement from Sessions, the attorney general said that he "took control of the Department of Justice the day I was sworn in, which is why we have had unprecedented success at effectuating the President’s agenda."

"While I am Attorney General, the actions of the Department of Justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations," the statement read. "I demand the highest standards, and where they are not met, I take action."

Thursday's statement from Sessions was his most forceful and direct pushback against the president since March, when Trump rebuked Sessions for referring Republican accusations of government surveillance abuses to the Justice Department's inspector general, rather than having the broader Justice Department investigate the matter.

"Why is A.G. Jeff Sessions asking the Inspector General to investigate potentially massive FISA abuse. Will take forever, has no prosecutorial power and already late with reports on Comey etc. Isn't the I.G. an Obama guy? Why not use Justice Department lawyers? DISGRACEFUL!" Trump tweeted at the time.

In response, Sessions issued a statement saying, "As long as I am the Attorney General, I will continue to discharge my duties with integrity and honor, and this Department will continue to do its work in a fair and impartial manner according to the law and Constitution."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ses...ed-political-considerations/story?id=57360499
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Presumably this is the same administrative management style he use to run corporation after corporation into bankruptcy and has his personal foundation facing charges in New York. The odd thing is, that as a TV performer he was famous for his "You're fired!" schtick, and now he cannot bring himself to say the words to Sessions. Either support the man you put on the job or fire him, but do not let the bad work and inadequate performance continue.

Instead The President undermines his own appointed Secretary publicly, and thus defeats his work in the important Department, and Executive, that Trump took an oath to administer for the good of the Nation and it's Constitution. It may not be a crime or misdemeanour, but it's a high disservice to the people and a clear breach of that oath. IT is exactly the sort of non-performance that impeaches not just 45 himself, but the entire Trump Administration.

What's he afraid of?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Presumably this is the same administrative management style he use to run corporation after corporation into bankruptcy and has his personal foundation facing charges in New York. The odd thing is, that as a TV performer he was famous for his "You're fired!" schtick, and now he cannot bring himself to say the words to Sessions. Either support the man you put on the job or fire him, but do not let the bad work and inadequate performance continue.

Instead The President undermines his own appointed Secretary publicly, and thus defeats his work in the important Department, and Executive, that Trump took an oath to administer for the good of the Nation and it's Constitution. It may not be a crime or misdemeanour, but it's a high disservice to the people and a clear breach of that oath. IT is exactly the sort of non-performance that impeaches not just 45 himself, but the entire Trump Administration.

What's he afraid of?
LOL! When you lost Lyndsey Graham, you're done for. That's who Sessions lost this week. He should resign before he's fired. He's lost not only the President, but an entire Republican party. As I said at the time, his unwise recusal will be his undoing.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
I would say that he has finally decided to grow a pair but more likely it is because he knows he is probably gone after the mid-terms.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
I would say that he has finally decided to grow a pair but more likely it is because he knows he is probably gone after the mid-terms.
I see. A Democrat AG works for and shields the President- Bobby Kennedy, Reno, Holder("I got my boy's back"). The Republican one suppose to work against him. Yawn.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
I see. A Democrat AG works for and shields the President- Bobby Kennedy, Reno, Holder("I got my boy's back"). The Republican one suppose to work against him. Yawn.
If Sessions really was undermining Trump, why wouldn't Trump simply fire him, and get his Administration back on track? That is his job, after all, and we know he relishes saying the words. Not doing it is not doing the job.

What's he afraid of?
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,117
2,762
113
As I said at the time, his unwise recusal will be his undoing.
Unwise as in:

1) Trump's ability to control and sabotage the Mueller investigation through a lackey AG was thwarted?

2) Trump's ability to order DOJ investigations and prosecutions of his political enemies was stymied?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Unwise as in:

1) Trump's ability to control and sabotage the Mueller investigation through a lackey AG was thwarted?

2) Trump's ability to order DOJ investigations and prosecutions of his political enemies was stymied?
He still has all those options, he always had. He's the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch. He didn't do it before because, at the time, the investigation had traction on the Republican side of the Congress. That is no longer the case.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,117
2,762
113
He still has all those options, he always had. He's the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch. He didn't do it before because, at the time, the investigation had traction on the Republican side of the Congress. That is no longer the case.
It's obvious that you agree that Trump is as guilty as sin if you advocate for, "abuse of power"; "obstruction of justice"; "dereliction of duty".
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
It's obvious that you agree that Trump is as guilty as sin if you advocate for, "abuse of power"; "obstruction of justice"; "dereliction of duty".
Actually, I agree with the strict interpretation of the Constitution which regulates what the Chief Executive may or may not do.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,117
2,762
113
Actually, I agree with the strict interpretation of the Constitution which regulates what the Chief Executive may or may not do.
Which according to you includes:

1) abuse of power

2) obstruction of justice

3) dereliction of duty

4) commission of high crimes and misdemeanors
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Which according to you includes:

1) abuse of power

2) obstruction of justice

3) dereliction of duty

4) commission of high crimes and misdemeanors
No. According to you. Neither I nor the Constitution considers firing any member of the Executive Branch as any of those things.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,117
2,762
113
No. According to you. Neither I nor the Constitution considers firing any member of the Executive Branch as any of those things.
Where in the constitution does it state that the President is immune for acting with "corrupt intent"?

And according to Trump's many statements and tweets he has repeatedly confirmed his corrupt intent if he were to fire the AG.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,645
69,612
113
He still has all those options, he always had. He's the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch. He didn't do it before because, at the time, the investigation had traction on the Republican side of the Congress. That is no longer the case.

Well, JC, Trump has lost the Omarosa option. She would have made a fitting A-G for this administration. The way things are going, Trump will have to appoint Seb Gorka or Stephen Miller to be A-G. Unless he makes friends w Steve Bannon again.

The wealth of high level legal talent available at the WH is stunning.
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
He still has all those options, he always had. He's the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch. He didn't do it before because, at the time, the investigation had traction on the Republican side of the Congress. That is no longer the case.
The Republicans are starting to flee the sinking Trump ship in troves. That's what happens when people support an individual out of fear or political expediency and not loyalty and respect.

The polls show more support for the investigation now than ever and Mueller's credibility is higher than ever before (jumped 11% in the last few days). But you knew that already, you were just trying to baffle our brains with your bull sh*t.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Where in the constitution does it state that the President is immune for acting with "corrupt intent"?

And according to Trump's many statements and tweets he has repeatedly confirmed his corrupt intent if he were to fire the AG.
No such law.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
The Republicans are starting to flee the sinking Trump ship in troves. That's what happens when people support an individual out of fear or political expediency and not loyalty and respect.

The polls show more support for the investigation now than ever and Mueller's credibility is higher than ever before (jumped 11% in the last few days). But you knew that already, you were just trying to baffle our brains with your bull sh*t.

Where is that data for the Republicans fleeing Trump?
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
Where is that data for the Republicans fleeing Trump?
lol, a few weeks ago you claimed you followed polls closely when you were making some BS claims. I quoted 3 seperate polls all proving your claims wrong and challenged you to produce your poll. You of-course didn't respond as you were caught red-handed.

So, I'll provide the data if you promise not to post on Terb for the next 30 days. Do we have a deal? Problem is, I don't trust you to keep your word.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
lol, a few weeks ago you claimed you followed polls closely when you were making some BS claims. I quoted 3 seperate polls all proving your claims wrong and challenged you to produce your poll. You of-course didn't respond as you were caught red-handed.

So, I'll provide the data if you promise not to post on Terb for the next 30 days. Do we have a deal? Problem is, I don't trust you to keep your word.
For the last time. Where is the data showing REPUBLICANS deserting Trump?
 
Toronto Escorts