by a man in New York
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oAy4IteZY
less people watching the big six American media
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oAy4IteZY
less people watching the big six American media
Good thing you never go on social media, watch or read any MSM then, isn't it? Nothing but pure fantasy from unknown sources somewhere in cyberdigispace, that just … sorta … exists.It's their own fault. The internet has exposed them for what they've been for decades. Just mat puppets and talking tits for the elite. Now they're being exposed for what they really are and all they can do is whine and try and enforce censorship via social media sites. Pathetic.
The internet has not exposed then as you say. It has changed the way in which people obtain information. The media will adapt although it will take time and it will be financially painful in the interim.It's their own fault. The internet has exposed them for what they've been for decades. Just mat puppets and talking tits for the elite. Now they're being exposed for what they really are and all they can do is whine and try and enforce censorship via social media sites. Pathetic.
Yup. And when the dust settles most people will be getting most news from the most reliable providers. Just like they already do now. <yawn>The internet has not exposed then as you say. It has changed the way in which people obtain information. The media will adapt although it will take time and it will be financially painful in the interim.
Are you referring to infowars?Yup. And when the dust settles most people will be getting most news from the most reliable providers. Just like they already do now. <yawn>
What's infowars? Newsbroke was kicking Alan Jones's ass anyway, he should not have been banned. Better to let him continue to take stinkfaces from Ms Fiorentini instead.Are you referring to infowars?
Painful indeed. The ad-supported model for digital properties encourages media outlets toward sensationalism, and away from boring fact. Let us hope that the news industry cracks the subscription nut.The internet has not exposed then as you say. It has changed the way in which people obtain information. The media will adapt although it will take time and it will be financially painful in the interim.
Imagine all that storm of roiling dust going by names, as if it was worth identifying and tracking!Are you referring to infowars?
Goodness! Imagine thinking it it ever was unbiased! I've been reading newspapers since Eisenhower — well, only the easy words — What's Korea Mommy? — and there hasn't been a year go by without someone claiming objective news has died. When did it ever live? When Yellow Journalism sparked the Spanish American War?The MSM was mortally wounded during the Dubya's presidency. It was put on life support under Obama and it expired, rather spectacularly, under Trump. The myth of an unbiased journalism has been finally and permanently laid to rest. All we got left is partisan and results oriented outlets. Perhaps it's for the best, no more pretending.
When they expose Trump's 4000 plus, and still counting lies and misleading facts, then obviously they then become the "fake" news. The fact is the majority of Americans still go by the various MSM sources whereas the 30% or so of the Trumptard cult followers will only be attracted by the only right wing Newsmedia in Fox News Network!! Does "money not control" this media. What else does??Goodness! Imagine thinking it it ever was unbiased! I've been reading newspapers since Eisenhower — well, only the easy words — What's Korea Mommy? — and there hasn't been a year go by without someone claiming objective news has died. When did it ever live? When Yellow Journalism sparked the Spanish American War?
Since human reproduction is a basic freedom means there's an endless supply of new customers for the charlatans who exploit the childish trust in familiar sources — Are Communists all bad Daddy? — because digging for facts, or insisting those sources offer them for your trust is hard work.
But every new adult generation has to learn that for itself. Along with, it's easier to sell lies in the language of the listener, and facts are still facts, even if they're old news from old sources.
Hence, I said:"no more pretending". I never said they were unbiased before.Goodness! Imagine thinking it it ever was unbiased! I've been reading newspapers since Eisenhower — well, only the easy words — What's Korea Mommy? — and there hasn't been a year go by without someone claiming objective news has died. When did it ever live? When Yellow Journalism sparked the Spanish American War?
Since human reproduction is a basic freedom means there's an endless supply of new customers for the charlatans who exploit the childish trust in familiar sources — Are Communists all bad Daddy? — because digging for facts, or insisting those sources offer them for your trust is hard work.
But every new adult generation has to learn that for itself. Along with, it's easier to sell lies in the language of the listener, and facts are still facts, even if they're old news from old sources.