Pickering Angels
Toronto Escorts

Trudeau would repeal c36

Fallsguy

New member
Dec 3, 2010
270
0
0
I saw the CTV interview. Trudeau didn't come right out and say he would repeal it, but he did compare it to the legalisation of marijuana, and he spoke of evidence based legislation instead of legislation based on ideology. He also spoke of legislation that was closer to the Supreme Court's original Bedford ruling. So, he was pretty clear, without coming right out and saying he would repeal it. I was heartened by what he said. Of course, if we end up with some kind of Liberal-NDP coalition or alliance, the NDP are on record as being in favour of full legalisation.
 

d_jedi

New member
Sep 5, 2005
8,765
1
0
He's not being very specific.. but I have to think just about anything would be better than c-36. It's time to get rid of the Harper Conservatives. I know I'll be actively involved in trying to kick them out of office.
 

bobcat40

Member
Jan 25, 2006
570
10
18
While I would welcome any changes, I feel Justin is a bit of a tool. He just says a bunch of vague things like "yea this sucks, we gotta change it...I'll tell you the details later". Which in political speak means a load of nothing. Besides criticizing almost everything the CONs have done, I can't really say I know which side of the fence he sits on most important issues.
 

TeasePlease

Cockasian Brother
Aug 3, 2010
7,740
4
38
He has come out strongly in favor of dictatorship and thinks China is a eco paradise so there is that.
Bah. I don't think that's a fair characterization of what he said. Taken in context, he was talking about the ability of a central dictatorship to be responsive in economic decisions.
 

stay

New member
May 21, 2013
906
2
0
judge's laughing
While I would welcome any changes, I feel Justin is a bit of a tool. He just says a bunch of vague things like "yea this sucks, we gotta change it...I'll tell you the details later". Which in political speak means a load of nothing. Besides criticizing almost everything the CONs have done, I can't really say I know which side of the fence he sits on most important issues.
He sits squarely on the middle.
 

shakenbake

Senior Turgid Member
Nov 13, 2003
7,633
1,675
113
Durham Region, Den of Iniquity
www.vafanculo.it
He probably means that he is against the provisions prohibiting advertising and sollicitingnear schools, but he may not be against criminalizing johns as he already declared shortly after supreme Court ruling that prostitution is violence against women and that his party will look at the Nordic model
With politicians being the way they are, our only hope is another SC challenge to knock C-36 down, and, hopefully, once and for all.
 

Terminator2000

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
3,374
101
63
While I would welcome any changes, I feel Justin is a bit of a tool. He just says a bunch of vague things like "yea this sucks, we gotta change it...I'll tell you the details later". Which in political speak means a load of nothing. Besides criticizing almost everything the CONs have done, I can't really say I know which side of the fence he sits on most important issues.
then why does he say and/or comment on these issues at all? instead he could say nothing at all regarding these issues.

whats the point of making pointless comments about the issues, then?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
While I would welcome any changes, I feel Justin is a bit of a tool. He just says a bunch of vague things like "yea this sucks, we gotta change it...I'll tell you the details later". Which in political speak means a load of nothing. Besides criticizing almost everything the CONs have done, I can't really say I know which side of the fence he sits on most important issues.
Don't you have any idea how a political campaign is run? The reasons you formulate and hold back your platform is simple, you don't want to give the opposition time to react, pick at your ideas and come up with alternatives. You also don't want to give them a chance to steal your ideas. Its really that simple. Also not too many people are paying attention right now
 

Fallsguy

New member
Dec 3, 2010
270
0
0
With politicians being the way they are, our only hope is another SC challenge to knock C-36 down, and, hopefully, once and for all.
Electing a Liberal or NDP government, or some kind of combination thereof, gives me some hope C36 will be overturned.
Re-electing the Cons gives me no hope that this will happen.
This makes it a really easy decision for me. ABC in '15.
... And yes C36 will be the driving factor behind my vote. This is a personal attack on me. I've been called a pervert by the Justice Minister and I've been made a criminal, even if, so far, in name only. So yes, it's very, very personal.
 

fmahovalich

Active member
Aug 21, 2009
7,255
13
38
No real need to discuss Justin, what he thinks, if he left right or otherwise.

Because Justin is never being elected. Move on folks, nothing to see here!
 

wilbur

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
2,079
0
36
No real need to discuss Justin, what he thinks, if he left right or otherwise.

Because Justin is never being elected. Move on folks, nothing to see here!
Don't bet on that. People don't always vote for who they want. Many vote against incumbent politicians they don't want. I'd say Harper is a prime candidate for being voted against. Doesn't mean Justin is smarter than anybody else. As long as Justin gets to learn to read a teleprompter as well as Obama.
 

fmahovalich

Active member
Aug 21, 2009
7,255
13
38
Don't bet on that. People don't always vote for who they want. Many vote against incumbent politicians they don't want. I'd say Harper is a prime candidate for being voted against. Doesn't mean Justin is smarter than anybody else. As long as Justin gets to learn to read a teleprompter as well as Obama.
Damn....too late. I've already bet against Trudeau.
 

MattRoxx

Call me anti-fascist
Nov 13, 2011
6,753
2
0
I get around.
Electing a Liberal or NDP government, or some kind of combination thereof, gives me some hope C36 will be overturned.
Re-electing the Cons gives me no hope that this will happen.
This makes it a really easy decision for me. ABC in '15.
... And yes C36 will be the driving factor behind my vote. This is a personal attack on me. I've been called a pervert by the Justice Minister and I've been made a criminal, even if, so far, in name only. So yes, it's very, very personal.
It is a terrible irony that the criminals currently running our government have already turned 4 of my personal and non-harmful activities into criminal acts. And they will keep going!
We need to get them out of power when the opportunity is there.

Stephen Harper is “the most vindictive politician I’ve ever met, someone who I think is ruthless to the bottom”
Harper Cons have “lied, cheated, stole elections, cancelled other people’s rights, and in the process crushed a lot of people”

https://citizenactionmonitor.wordpr...omeone-who-i-think-is-ruthless-to-the-bottom/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPqz3wb0Bes
 

elusion

Member
Jul 2, 2009
600
0
16
Electing a Liberal or NDP government, or some kind of combination thereof, gives me some hope C36 will be overturned.
Re-electing the Cons gives me no hope that this will happen.
This makes it a really easy decision for me. ABC in '15.
... And yes C36 will be the driving factor behind my vote. This is a personal attack on me. I've been called a pervert by the Justice Minister and I've been made a criminal, even if, so far, in name only. So yes, it's very, very personal.
Absolutely. No truer words spoken. We should be all in on this one. Let's put all our efforts together to throw those bums out of office.
 

fmahovalich

Active member
Aug 21, 2009
7,255
13
38
Absolutely. No truer words spoken. We should be all in on this one. Let's put all our efforts together to throw those bums out of office.

Wow. Your view of a country's government and it's responsibilities is so so sooooooo narrow.

You have a right to vote as you please....in this case...on a very very very insignificant topic. But go ahead.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
18,060
12,485
113
Wow. Your view of a country's government and it's responsibilities is so so sooooooo narrow.

You have a right to vote as you please....in this case...on a very very very insignificant topic. But go ahead.
How can you say making all of us criminals with a stroke of a pen for consensual is insignificant?

Harpo , Mackay and Smith should be made insignificant by ousting them out of power!
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,355
9
38
Bah. I don't think that's a fair characterization of what he said. Taken in context, he was talking about the ability of a central dictatorship to be responsive in economic decisions.
Thank you TeasePlease. May I quote you the next time I hear someone bashing JT on that issue?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts