Toronto Escorts

Celine Bisette: Sex workers unite

eznutz

Active member
Jul 17, 2007
2,394
0
36
Last month, Toronto sex worker Jessica Lee issued a statement on the Toronto Escort Review Board, a website for people who buy and sell sexual services in the Toronto area. In her posting, she urged her fellow sex workers to join her in a campaign to send letters to parliamentarians, informing them about the experiences of people who practice “high end sex work.” Her goal is to convince Parliament to reject Bill C-36, legislation that would, if passed, criminalize many aspects of the sex trade.

Lee christened her campaign the “Happy Hookers of Canada” and explained that her movement is necessary because it “separates the experience of [those] choosing high end sex work” from “those stuck in the survival sex trade.” She argued that high end sex work is “generally a free-will choice” made by “empowered women” and contrasted it with survival sex work, which she claimed is entered into by people facing poverty, battling addictions or experiencing mental health problems.

As a sex worker of nine years and a fellow advocate of decriminalizing the sex trade in Canada, I was dismayed to learn of Lee’s attempt to divide sex workers into categories of either happy or unhappy. I was also disappointed to see her reinforce the myth that addiction and mental illness are problems faced primarily by so-called survival sex workers, and rarely by high end escorts. The reality is that people working in our industry have diverse experiences. Some enjoy doing sex work. Others do not. Some people are ambivalent.

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/08/05/celine-bisette-sex-workers-unite/
 

Viggo Rasmussen

New member
Feb 5, 2010
2,652
0
0
I haven't seen where Jessica denies there are diverse experiences.
She hasn't said those working to survive mostly have mental or addiction problems.
 

MPAsquared

www.musemassagespa.com
Clearly some folks have missed the point of HHC. I'll say this for the 10th time...HHC started because many of us felt that only the bad stories & survival sex work stories were told in Committee. We felt divided & left out. Not all of us work for survival. Not all of us are forced to work. Many of us are happy & ambitious. There is hypocrisy in that article! Telling the bad side is ok, but a movement about the good is separation? I call bullshit & I told Maggie's such as well! Shame on them for trying to discredit the notion of happy. There was a time many words were used to demean someone. Playboy, gay, slut. They are now words of empowerment.

If some folks can't see past their own formula, that is their problem. We have tons & tons of letters of beautiful stories. Clearly our movement has merit.

The division of sex workers is only being divided by nay-sayers. HHC has yet to condemn anyone's experience. This article is ignorant by choice. Boooo!
 

Viggo Rasmussen

New member
Feb 5, 2010
2,652
0
0
A rebuttal would be a good idea, as long as it isn't an attack on their work or denying their experiences. It should be positive, putting out there that many sex workers are doing okay.

And though many can't wrap their heads around the concept, some are even happy!
 

TeasePlease

Cockasian Brother
Aug 3, 2010
7,740
4
38
You presume the Post is interested in fair reporting?

A dark side of the industry does exist. To say otherwise is disingenuous and not credible. To Maggie's point, all sexworkers deserve respect and protection. That is plainly reasonable. BUT, we can't paint all sexworkers with the same brush. We can't say that all sexworkers are coerced any more than we can say that all are working of their own free will and desire. Differences in circumstance DO exist and they CANNOT be ignored.

Bill C-36 is premised upon significant, foundational assumptions about sexwork and sexworkers. Unfortunately, the worldview of the drafters is heavily biased towards a paternalistic, save-the-victim mentality. How can this skewed framework then be applied to sexworkers who don't fit that paradigm? That simply makes for bad, and unjust, law.

Inasmuch as the CPC and other pro-C36 advocates want to portray the industry as being a quagmire of despair and disparity, the other end of the spectrum needs to be brought to light. Happy Hookers is doing a public service! lol.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
18,061
12,493
113
You presume the Post is interested in fair reporting?

A dark side of the industry does exist. To say otherwise is disingenuous and not credible. To Maggie's point, all sexworkers deserve respect and protection. That is plainly reasonable. BUT, we can't paint all sexworkers with the same brush. We can't say that all sexworkers are coerced any more than we can say that all are working of their own free will and desire. Differences in circumstance DO exist and they CANNOT be ignored.

Bill C-36 is premised upon significant, foundational assumptions about sexwork and sexworkers. Unfortunately, the worldview of the drafters is heavily biased towards a paternalistic, save-the-victim mentality. How can this skewed framework then be applied to sexworkers who don't fit that paradigm? That simply makes for bad, and unjust, law.

Inasmuch as the CPC and other pro-C36 advocates want to portray the industry as being a quagmire of despair and disparity, the other end of the spectrum needs to be brought to light. Happy Hookers is doing a public service! lol.
The government is painting the industry with one brush and that is all sex workers are exploited and are victims. The HHC shows this is not the case and I agree a rebuttal is needed but at the same time it is very important to fight this bill as one very strong and united front against these ridiculous abolitionist and religious moralizing fanatics.
 

Marla

Active member
Mar 29, 2010
1,563
12
38
59
ajax
It seems movements always get painted with a them vs us leaning. I am very active in the Happpy Hookers and my mission is to advocate consensual sex working what ever shape or form that may be. From the preamble of the Happy Hooker Movement it makes this very clear. There are some women who are just plain bitchy and trying to discredit new movements because they are used to the old platforms. The author happens to be one of them and is nitpicking and taking things out of context. There is no us vs/ them in the Happy Hooker movement. It is a dedicated forward thinking group of women who have a commom goal. The movement doesn't have time or interest for pertty in-fighting. There will always be nay-sayers. So be it.
 

Viggo Rasmussen

New member
Feb 5, 2010
2,652
0
0
You presume the Post is interested in fair reporting?

A dark side of the industry does exist. To say otherwise is disingenuous and not credible.
The Post has many readers and writers with a libertarian streak who support prostitution and want fair reporting.

Jessica and Happy Hookers acknowledge a dark side, never denied it - they are saying the bright side is their experience.
 

Ms.FemmeFatale

Behind the camera
Jun 18, 2011
3,127
0
36
www.msfemmefatale.com
The government is painting the industry with one brush and that is all sex workers are exploited and are victims. The HHC shows this is not the case and I agree a rebuttal is needed but at the same time it is very important to fight this bill as one very strong and united front against these ridiculous abolitionist and religious moralizing fanatics.

Thank you!!!!!!

The HHC is probably the best way to counter this bill in my opinion. BECAUSE the government is painting everyone the same way, they need to see that that is NOT the case. This Bill affects those who the government basically says are people who don't exist.

Places like Maggie's who are trying to show that women who are drug addicted should be allowed to run free in their sexual services is NOT a picture that most Canadians want to see. Partly me included. I am sorry, I will say it. I do not want a woman who is addicted to crack having to sell herself to get her high. In my opinion, that is not a free choice. In my opinion that is what finds the sex worker in harmful situation as she is not thinking clearly. I will not stop her as it is her life, her body but I will not agree with her choice. Just like I would not agree with her choice to steal, scam, rob, whatever to get her high as well.

Now I am not saying that all sex workers should not have a voice. I agree they should, but if we really want something to change with this Bill, then showing the government and the Canadian people that what Harper/McKay are saying about ALL sex workers is completely false. Not ALL sex worker is exploitative, not ALL clients are perverts. They need to enforce the laws on the books that they have already. All this Bill does is make things worse. That we cal all agree on.

Also, some of these people need to

A) get over the damn name already.
B) stop telling those who are happy that they can't share that. The exclusion of sex worker voices is NOT from the HHC but from all those trying to shut it down. Stop silencing sex workers. ALL should have a voice.


There was something Maggies said somewhere about need to show harm to sex workers not happy stories of success. That being happy doesn't show the harm. Maybe showing all this "harm" is exactly why people like Harper/McKay feel that ALL sex workers are in some need of help and protection. I really wish I could find where it was written but man did I shake my head at it. You don't want the government to look at all sex workers as victims, but yet you don't want to show empowered free-will escorts who are safe and happy???? Cause that makes so much sense. :rolleyes: Sorry, but I don't know any HAPPY HOOKERS who are not safe.

The HHC is against the Bill just like everyone else. The HHC agrees that safety options are endanger with this bill. When they feel safe, they feel happy. When they don't feel safe like this Bill will make it, clearly they won't be happy anymore. Maybe people need to understand what happy means and what happiness includes.
 

TeasePlease

Cockasian Brother
Aug 3, 2010
7,740
4
38
HHC has a much more palatable position for amending the bill. Anyone who has played this through to the end game can see that. That's the real problem.
 

Marla

Active member
Mar 29, 2010
1,563
12
38
59
ajax
Ultimately it will be up to each province to decide if they want ot enforce the bill. The HHC's letters to Kathleen Wynne as an initiative, if all else fails will be extremely productive. As a persecuted woman herself, hopefully she will have empathy for what all of these women and Johns are expressing.
 

Viggo Rasmussen

New member
Feb 5, 2010
2,652
0
0
HHC is new on the block, it's understandable if their position is misunderstood or sneered at by those fighting for sex workers for decades.
Don't fight them, they're on your side for safety and freedoms even if they don't see it.
 

jckyoung

Active member
Jan 27, 2011
379
61
28
If all sp where licenced and some how forced to pay taxes from their work. Would the government change their tune.
 

Fallsguy

New member
Dec 3, 2010
270
0
0
I haven't seen where Jessica denies there are diverse experiences.
She hasn't said those working to survive mostly have mental or addiction problems.
HHC breaks the victim narrative, and this really bothers some people in both camps of the debate. Maggies sees its' role as being the voice of the voiceless. HHC sees its' role as giving the unheard a chance to be heard. Either way its a healthy development to show that the sex workers community isn't a monotholic whole and because of its diversity and range of experiences no one group speaks for all sex workers. Yet, both groups are working towards the same goal. Bill C36 is a bad law that will do great harm, and the more it is said by more people in and out of the sex trade, the better.
 

TeasePlease

Cockasian Brother
Aug 3, 2010
7,740
4
38
Indeed. I might actually have to buy the Post this weekend!

If they don't run it, don't get too stressed out. The Post is a shadow of what it used to be. I've run ads in the Post and the Globe and the ratio of feedback from clients is something like 500 (globe):1 (post).
 

Viggo Rasmussen

New member
Feb 5, 2010
2,652
0
0
Newspapers are a far cry from what they used to be, but that's in paid copies on the street. Articles still get read a lot when posted and reposted as internet content.
Bigger numbers than your Humble and Fred interview, I'd say.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts