Toronto Escorts

Girlsifound

albert

New member
Feb 1, 2002
9
0
0
sw ontario
This isn't quite an escort review (sorry - debated whether to put this in the lounge).
There's a guy in Kitchener named Chuck who used to run an adult website called http:\\www.girlsifound.com. He would have ads in the local paper as I recall. Every week he would have girls from the area on the site, but it stopped being updated in the spring, and then the spring stuff was removed so now it only reflects girls he shot up to the end of 2002. My questions are:
1. Anyone know what happened to Chuck & the website?
2. Anyone know if any of the girls on his site (who are mostly in the SW Ontario area) do escort or MP?
Enquiring minds want to know.
 

SirLoin

King Tongue
Jan 7, 2002
35
0
0
didn't this dude get arrested a few months ago? a friend of mine mentioned that he saw a short piece on this on the news sometime around late spring. he stated something about the age of the girls wasn't always legal. that's all i've heard. and who knows how much is true.

anyone else have any other news?
 

albert

New member
Feb 1, 2002
9
0
0
sw ontario
SirLoin - I think you might be right. Did a search on the owner of the domain name and got this:
http://www.digitaldefence.ca/news/2003_030516b.htm
 

SirLoin

King Tongue
Jan 7, 2002
35
0
0
wow

well, well, well. the dude did look like a dirtball in the pics. that's not cool at all. you gotta draw a line somewhere. i wonder how these charges will turn out.
 
D

dorian_gray

Re: Girls I Found Girls

8 1/2":

So we have seen April (aka Summer) before. Did you remember if she had a tattoo by the belly? From the looks of it, the photos were taken when she was still nursing her kid, coz her tits were bigger than I remember. The tattoo thing also made me think if she started working for Amber after the photoshot. Do you know where she's gone. She's one of the few SPs in the area I actually do miss.

DG.
 

SirLoin

King Tongue
Jan 7, 2002
35
0
0
Re: Re: wow

abendigo said:
You believe everything you read in the papers? How do you know what really happened? Maybe the girls lied about thier age, or had fake ID?
dude, i didn't realize that this was gonna upset you so much.

and yep, i do believe a decent majority of the facts that i come across in newspapers. if you check out the brief news posting on this incident, its pretty clear cut and basic. now tv, that's a total different story.
 

Trelew

Banned
Aug 18, 2001
671
0
0
Hamilton
I've actually done some computer work for this guy. I wouldn't be suprised if there are some ladies that been either underage or pretty damn close to it. While he is a pretty good businessman, his tactics leave you shaking your head. I've heard that there are quite a few ladies who will have nothing to do with him...ever.
 

abendigo

Member
Oct 13, 2002
53
0
6
58
Downtown Toronto
Re: Re: Re: wow

SirLoin said:
dude, i didn't realize that this was gonna upset you so much.
Perhaps I over-reacted. But I, through personal experience, know that papers often exagerate, or leave out certain facts. Many years ago, while in my early twenties, I was leaving a drinking establishment, with about 6 too many drinks in my system. I found what I thought was a secluded ally in which to relieve my bladder. I was charged with urinating in public, which happens to be a sexually related offence. The paper mentioned the later, but not the former. Now, when the paper says "45 persons with sex related convictions reside in the neighbourhood", I am counted. So, untill I hear for a fact that this person was molesting 10 year old kids, I am not going to jump to that conclusion.
 

bOOTyMaN

AssPirate
Apr 4, 2003
519
0
0
On the High Sea's
Perhaps I over-reacted. But I, through personal experience, know that papers often exagerate, or leave out certain facts. Many years ago, while in my early twenties, I was leaving a drinking establishment, with about 6 too many drinks in my system. I found what I thought was a secluded ally in which to relieve my bladder. I was charged with urinating in public, which happens to be a sexually related offence. The paper mentioned the later, but not the former. Now, when the paper says "45 persons with sex related convictions reside in the neighbourhood", I am counted. So, untill I hear for a fact that this person was molesting 10 year old kids, I am not going to jump to that conclusion.


See what happens when you shake it more than twice :p
j/k that does sux but that Chuck dude is a real sleeze bag.


Cheers
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts