New her on dundas st east. She was OK but in a gawd awful hole to work in. She had a boss judy i think who was a somewhat tough broad to deal with. Get rid of judy and she has a chance, she is a good woman once you get past the boss.
chuck
chuck
Anastacia
- Thread starter chuckitoute
- Start date
re..bold1
Hey bold1..I think your being way too sensitive. If anything the only thing chuck got wrong was that Judy is not her boss, everything else is about right. She did work out of a dump, Judy can be tough to deal with and Anastacia is a good woman. We all know Anastacia is a friend of yours, but telling chuck to get a life is out of line since he did not attack her. Maybe you need to consider who needs to get a life. This is not meant to start a flame war...just for you to re-evaluate your comments.
Hey bold1..I think your being way too sensitive. If anything the only thing chuck got wrong was that Judy is not her boss, everything else is about right. She did work out of a dump, Judy can be tough to deal with and Anastacia is a good woman. We all know Anastacia is a friend of yours, but telling chuck to get a life is out of line since he did not attack her. Maybe you need to consider who needs to get a life. This is not meant to start a flame war...just for you to re-evaluate your comments.
Bold1 is 100% correct. Chuckitoute is a sleazeball who was buddies with the person who made Anastacia's life miserable. He spread an ugly rumor and should stick to his buddy's butt, where he belongs.
Your right bold1...I did not know the history behind this. And if he is a sleazeball, he should be outed. ON the other hand, as you did mention that you go there to sit and talk, I believe that even if someone made a valid complaint against Anastacia, you would still swing into the rescue and defend her. That is not what this board is for. It is for the review of the SP's, MP's, and others in the adult industry. Let's keep it that way.
This is begining to sound like a school yard scrap in kindergarten! Everyone is so involved in caustic and nasty jabs at each other that they are forgetting the primary message and the person.
Anastacia - one of the finest, good looking, intelligent ladies you will likely ever meet. Yes, I am predjudiced, I've had the pleasure of knowing her for close to two years and have never been dissatisfied. As a SP, everyone has to judge for themselves because what makes me happy may not be what you want. First and foremost -she is a lady, treat her like a lady, and you will be a happy camper.
Judy - I've known even longer. Over many hours and many coffees, we have discussed everything under the sun (and never come to blows!). She is a fine person and a good friend to Anastacia. I have no problems with Judy, she has always treated me quite nice.
The bottom line is, look at the good side of everyone. We all have our faults - don't dwell on them. When we say mean and nasty things about others, we are just exposing our own weaknesses and faults. Let's move on and leave Anastacia and Judy alone. If we have something to say about them - make it positive!
The musings of a Silver Fox
Anastacia - one of the finest, good looking, intelligent ladies you will likely ever meet. Yes, I am predjudiced, I've had the pleasure of knowing her for close to two years and have never been dissatisfied. As a SP, everyone has to judge for themselves because what makes me happy may not be what you want. First and foremost -she is a lady, treat her like a lady, and you will be a happy camper.
Judy - I've known even longer. Over many hours and many coffees, we have discussed everything under the sun (and never come to blows!). She is a fine person and a good friend to Anastacia. I have no problems with Judy, she has always treated me quite nice.
The bottom line is, look at the good side of everyone. We all have our faults - don't dwell on them. When we say mean and nasty things about others, we are just exposing our own weaknesses and faults. Let's move on and leave Anastacia and Judy alone. If we have something to say about them - make it positive!
The musings of a Silver Fox
re: Silver Fox
So far Silver, I have made no caustic remarks about anyone. In fact I am trying to get this back to what it should be....reviewing the hobby. This includes both GOOD and BAD reviews and our ability to discuss them. I am reminding all (but here most specifically, bold1) that leaping to the rescue of the ladies reviewed on this site, though well intentioned, certainly can appear to be shilling. Though in this case unnecessary since Anastacia has already a good reputation. Saying that a woman is "tough", i.e JUdy, is not a disparaging remark nor a fault. It is the way she is and how she must be approached. This thereby letting other hobbiests know that getting into this woman's face is not the way to go. Treated with respect will get you a lot farther.
As I stated in my previous post, I apologized for not knowing the particulars in regards to chuck and I stated what should be done to people that irresponsibly take shots at Sp's. If anything, Silver, the comments you made i.e., "kindergarten scrap", "nasty jabs" is actually what is turning this into a "scrap". Continue on with your statement of making only positive reviews about Anastacia and Judy and I find this shilling at best. I know of one person who had a bad time with Anastacia (not on this board, a personal friend of mine) as compared to the number who had good times. Does this make his review, if he were to post one, invalid and not deserving of comment? If so, then Fred might as well shut this board down. That is not the purpose of this board. It is to describe both bad experiences and good experiences, allow the hobbiest to balance those reviews and make his decision.
So far Silver, I have made no caustic remarks about anyone. In fact I am trying to get this back to what it should be....reviewing the hobby. This includes both GOOD and BAD reviews and our ability to discuss them. I am reminding all (but here most specifically, bold1) that leaping to the rescue of the ladies reviewed on this site, though well intentioned, certainly can appear to be shilling. Though in this case unnecessary since Anastacia has already a good reputation. Saying that a woman is "tough", i.e JUdy, is not a disparaging remark nor a fault. It is the way she is and how she must be approached. This thereby letting other hobbiests know that getting into this woman's face is not the way to go. Treated with respect will get you a lot farther.
As I stated in my previous post, I apologized for not knowing the particulars in regards to chuck and I stated what should be done to people that irresponsibly take shots at Sp's. If anything, Silver, the comments you made i.e., "kindergarten scrap", "nasty jabs" is actually what is turning this into a "scrap". Continue on with your statement of making only positive reviews about Anastacia and Judy and I find this shilling at best. I know of one person who had a bad time with Anastacia (not on this board, a personal friend of mine) as compared to the number who had good times. Does this make his review, if he were to post one, invalid and not deserving of comment? If so, then Fred might as well shut this board down. That is not the purpose of this board. It is to describe both bad experiences and good experiences, allow the hobbiest to balance those reviews and make his decision.
Anastacia has updated her web site at http://www.geocities.com/anastacia282003 . The update includes her e-mail address and her new hours.
My visits with Anastacia over the last couple years have always been great. Without a doubt, the best value and quality of service in the London area in my opinion. I haven't seen her since her re-location but will be visiting soon. Like most guys, I hated going to the previous location because it was a dump. Never had a problem with the phone lady while waiting for my appointment.
